2011
DOI: 10.14746/rie.2011.5.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to legitimate the European Union and the integration process: EU governance approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most widely held theories that attempt to explain the governance of EU member states are: (1) intergovernmentalism, according to which member states are the ones controlling the policy decision-making, its processes and its outcomes ( Hoffmann, 1982 , Garrett, 1992 , Moravcsik, 1993 and 1998; Schimmelfennig, 2003 and 2015; Bickerton et al, 2015a , Bickerton et al, 2015b ), and (2) supranationalism, which revolves around political decision-making by organizations that go beyond the national sphere ( Volodin, 2011 , Niemann and Ioannou, 2015 , Börzel and Risse, 2018 , Thaler, 2020 , Matthijs, 2020 ). If these policies are implemented by the EU's own institutions, then it is supranational decision making ( Büthe, 2016 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most widely held theories that attempt to explain the governance of EU member states are: (1) intergovernmentalism, according to which member states are the ones controlling the policy decision-making, its processes and its outcomes ( Hoffmann, 1982 , Garrett, 1992 , Moravcsik, 1993 and 1998; Schimmelfennig, 2003 and 2015; Bickerton et al, 2015a , Bickerton et al, 2015b ), and (2) supranationalism, which revolves around political decision-making by organizations that go beyond the national sphere ( Volodin, 2011 , Niemann and Ioannou, 2015 , Börzel and Risse, 2018 , Thaler, 2020 , Matthijs, 2020 ). If these policies are implemented by the EU's own institutions, then it is supranational decision making ( Büthe, 2016 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%