Background: The current survey are to evaluate the quality of patient identification documentation and medical notes writing in our public hospital and to ensure compliance with the international clinical record keeping requirements. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional survey of randomly collected case notes from the hospital documentation and information office, where 100 case notes for patients who were admitted during 2015, from five hospital wards and a total of 500 case notes were reviewed and its completeness was assessed in the contents of hospital medical files as frequencies (%). Results: The patient's registration number, Unit, Name, Age, Nationality, Admission and Discharge dates were recorded in (85-100%) of cases in almost all wards. Mother's name, Birth date, Marital status, Profession, Place of work, Phone number in General Medicine, General Surgery and Orthopaedic wards were recorded in (<20% of cases). Address, Final diagnosis, Outcome also were recorded in (<50%) in General Medicine wards, and in (80-100%) in Surgery and Orthopaedic wards. All the late parameters were recorded in (92-100%) in Obstetric ward. Regarding pediatric wards, the same data were recorded in (60-85%) for all parameters. Regarding Time, round's leader, doctor's name and Signature on the clinical entry notes were all recorded in (<40%), doctor's Designation was not written at all. Conclusion: This survey shows the documentation of important patient information is lacking behind the international standards. Poor documentation in medical records might compromises the quality of care, had a medico-legal implications and undermine analyses based on retrospective medical files reviews.