2015
DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2015-001155
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to interpret visual fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, by precluding any surface on one side of space from causing retinal cell activation, we lose activity on the same side of both retinas-i.e., a homonymous hemianopia. This maps to the deficits found on lesions to the retinocortical pathway before and after the optic chiasm, respectively (Lueck, 2010;Wong and Plant, 2015). This highlights the inevitability of these visual field defects following lesions to the visual pathway, under the assumption that the brain uses a model that represents the same surfaces as causes of data on both retinas.…”
Section: The Retinocortical Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Alternatively, by precluding any surface on one side of space from causing retinal cell activation, we lose activity on the same side of both retinas-i.e., a homonymous hemianopia. This maps to the deficits found on lesions to the retinocortical pathway before and after the optic chiasm, respectively (Lueck, 2010;Wong and Plant, 2015). This highlights the inevitability of these visual field defects following lesions to the visual pathway, under the assumption that the brain uses a model that represents the same surfaces as causes of data on both retinas.…”
Section: The Retinocortical Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…2 In this method, V4e is the largest and most intense target that maps the farthest peripheral vision, III4e is a middle-sized target that is used in the definitions for driving standard and legal blindness in Canada, and I4e is the second smallest sized target and is more sensitive in detecting field loss in the central 30 degrees of vision. 3 5 Hence, it is more informative to measure all three targets when evaluating the VF loss in RP. However, calculating the whole VF areas quantitatively (in mm 2 or degree 2 ) is a tedious and time-consuming process because the fields are measured and drawn manually on paper sheets if historic data are used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual fields are typically the first part of the visual function affected by ICP with peripheral constriction, an enlargement of the blind spot and or an inferior nasal step or partial arcuate defect [86,87]. For the general neurologist, interpretation of the visual fields is essential as in IIH cognitive factors including subject attention, motivation, fatigue, and response bias can influence the results.…”
Section: Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%