2021
DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Integrate CYP2D6 Phenoconversion Into Clinical Pharmacogenetics: A Tutorial

Abstract: CYP2D6 genotype is increasingly being integrated into practice to guide prescribing of certain medications. The CYP2D6 drug metabolizing enzyme is susceptible to inhibition by concomitant drugs, which can lead to a clinical phenotype that is different from the genotype‐based phenotype, a process referred to as phenoconversion. Phenoconversion is highly prevalent but not widely integrated into practice because of either limited experience on how to integrate or lack of knowledge that it has occurred. We built a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(129 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Furthermore, we also built models where patients’ phenotype was converted prior to multivariable adjustment by multiplying the patients’ CYP2D6 activity scores by factors of 0.5 and 0 for the concomitant intake of moderate and strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, respectively. 17 CYP2D6 genotype‐inferred phenotype was treated as an ordinal variable and coded as 0, 1, 2, or 3 for PM, IM, NM, and UM, respectively. Although inferred phenotypes are widely used in PK association studies, 18 , 19 , 20 as a sensitivity analysis, we also assessed a single key variant of CYP2D6*4 , rs3892097, which is prevalent within populations of European descent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16 Furthermore, we also built models where patients’ phenotype was converted prior to multivariable adjustment by multiplying the patients’ CYP2D6 activity scores by factors of 0.5 and 0 for the concomitant intake of moderate and strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, respectively. 17 CYP2D6 genotype‐inferred phenotype was treated as an ordinal variable and coded as 0, 1, 2, or 3 for PM, IM, NM, and UM, respectively. Although inferred phenotypes are widely used in PK association studies, 18 , 19 , 20 as a sensitivity analysis, we also assessed a single key variant of CYP2D6*4 , rs3892097, which is prevalent within populations of European descent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We referred to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Inhibitors to provide an objective list of such medications to consider 16 . Furthermore, we also built models where patients’ phenotype was converted prior to multivariable adjustment by multiplying the patients’ CYP2D6 activity scores by factors of 0.5 and 0 for the concomitant intake of moderate and strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, respectively 17 . CYP2D6 genotype‐inferred phenotype was treated as an ordinal variable and coded as 0, 1, 2, or 3 for PM, IM, NM, and UM, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This potential confounder involving drug-drug interactions can ultimately influence the prevalence of DGIs and treatment response. For example, concomitant administration of medications such as bupropion, fluoxetine and paroxetine which are CYP2D6 inhibitors could result in an adjusted CYP2D6 phenotype that is different to genotype-based prediction of drug metabolism ( Owen et al, 2009 ; Cicali et al, 2021 ; Hahn and Roll, 2021 ). Another limitation in our sub-analysis includes the small number of patients restricting additional data analyses related to RAR and race/ethnicity ( Ruaño et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adjusted for strong/moderate inhibitors (e.g., paroxetine and quinidine for CYP2D6 and fluoxetine and fluvoxamine for CYP2C19), as they play a major role in phenoconversion, a phenomenon whereby drug-gene or drug-drug-gene interactions may result in an observed phenotype different from the geneticallypredicted phenotype. 35 We did not adjust for BMI in order to avoid the risk of overadjustment bias. 36 Effect estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and uncorrected p values in tables and forest plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%