2010
DOI: 10.1002/sia.3384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to increase the hydrophobicity of PTFE surfaces using an r.f. atmospheric‐pressure plasma torch

Abstract: An experimental investigation of the surface modification of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) by an Ar and Ar/O 2 plasma created with an atmospheric-pressure radio frequency (r.f.) torch is presented here. The surfaces were analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), XPS and water contact angle (WCA) to get an insight of the surface morphology and chemistry. An increase of roughness is observed with the Ar/O 2 plasma treatment. The WCA analysis shows that these surfaces are more hydrophobic than pristine PTFE; a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase may be due to the observed changes in morphology (increase in roughness) as opposed to an increase in the hydrophobicity of the film surface. In related studies (Marais and others ; Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ), treatments with a microwave‐induced, low‐pressure tetrafluoromethane plasma and an RF‐induced low‐pressure O 2 ‐plasma increased the water contact angles of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) and polyethylene films and polytetrafluoroethylene films, respectively. The researchers suggested that the observed increases in contact angle were resulted from increases in average surface roughness due to CPT‐induced etching (Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This increase may be due to the observed changes in morphology (increase in roughness) as opposed to an increase in the hydrophobicity of the film surface. In related studies (Marais and others ; Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ), treatments with a microwave‐induced, low‐pressure tetrafluoromethane plasma and an RF‐induced low‐pressure O 2 ‐plasma increased the water contact angles of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) and polyethylene films and polytetrafluoroethylene films, respectively. The researchers suggested that the observed increases in contact angle were resulted from increases in average surface roughness due to CPT‐induced etching (Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…dedicated topics in symposia on plasma and material science), notably for thin film deposition, 1-3 surface treatment, [4][5][6] and biomedical applications. [7][8][9] Their attractiveness stems principally from both a non-reliance on elaborate vacuum technology and their low operating gas temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, our group showed that it was possible to obtain very hydrophobic PTFE surfaces by using an atmospheric plasma torch. The carrier gas was argon, and the necessity to add oxygen gas to the plasma was highlighted 19…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%