2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to improve strategic decision-making in complex systems when only qualitative information is available

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrated assessment is the combination of existing and/or new methodologies intended to improve significantly the scientific analysis of any complex issue. These methodologies can also be extended as a means to identify and design the social contexts where decisions are made or considered [3]. In this regard, a methodology that combines tools from different fields of knowledge (social, natural and exact sciences) is suggested in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Integrated assessment is the combination of existing and/or new methodologies intended to improve significantly the scientific analysis of any complex issue. These methodologies can also be extended as a means to identify and design the social contexts where decisions are made or considered [3]. In this regard, a methodology that combines tools from different fields of knowledge (social, natural and exact sciences) is suggested in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify which are the essential variables to understand the evolution of the assessed system [3,[29][30][31], the Matrice d'Impacts Croisés-Multiplication Appliquée à une Classification method (MICMAC) was implemented.…”
Section: The Qualitative Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study illustrates how it is possible to define management targets for the whole island, based on an integrated landscape characterization, and using existing methods for the evaluation and prioritization of areas for conservation management. The proposed methodology, developed in a context of limited available information (see also Giakoumi et al, 2011;and Corral-Quintana et al, 2016) presented, for each scenario, different levels of accuracy that must be stressed. In fact, after applying the Pontius metrics (Pontius and Millones, 2011) for assessing the geographical accuracy of results by comparing them with the existing reserves (Fig.…”
Section: Comparing Management Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%