2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to improve loco-regional control in stages IIIa–b NSCLC?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies are as mentioned published previously but in short patients in the Satellite trial had a median survival of 17 months with a toxicity profile inferior to what usually is seen in concurrent chemoradiation. The RAKET trial had a median survival of 17.8 months, with all arms showing acceptable side effects, however there was no difference between the arms regarding local control or survival [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The studies are as mentioned published previously but in short patients in the Satellite trial had a median survival of 17 months with a toxicity profile inferior to what usually is seen in concurrent chemoradiation. The RAKET trial had a median survival of 17.8 months, with all arms showing acceptable side effects, however there was no difference between the arms regarding local control or survival [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistics for the main studies have been previously described [ 5 , 6 ]. The OS survival analyses are done according to the Kaplan Meier method and possible univariate differences between groups are estimated with log-rank test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data were collected retrospectively from two different phase II studies evaluating radiotherapy in stage III NSCLC conducted between the years 2002-2007 in Sweden. The first study, the RAKET trial [22], was a three-armed randomized trial of 151 patients with NSCLC stage IIIA/IIIB treated with induction chemotherapy (carboplatin AUC 6/paclitaxel 200 mg/m 2 ) followed by either A, hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy 1.7 Gy twice-a-day to 64.6 Gy concurrent with a third cycle chemotherapy, B, radiotherapy with 2 Gy daily to 60 Gy concurrent with daily paclitaxel 12 mg/m 2 , or C, radiotherapy with 2 Gy daily to 60 Gy concurrent with weekly paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 . The second study, the Satellite trial [23], was a one-armed phase II trial of 71 patients with NSCLC stage IIIA/IIIB treated with two cycles of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 /docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 ) followed by radiotherapy, 2 Gy daily, to 68 Gy concurrent with weekly cetuximab (initial dose of 400 mg/m 2 followed by 250 mg/m 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resulted in an improvement in overall survival of 4.5% at 5 years (15.1 vs. 10.6%, p  = 0.004) and as suggested by the authors of this study, survival may be directly related to loco-regional control. The risk of regional failure, i.e., in the mediastinum, is relatively low after chemo-radiation to a dose of approximately 60 Gy with conventional fractionation (5, 7); in contrast, the rate of local failure remains relatively high. As such, it seems reasonable to propose that techniques to improve primary tumor control through dose escalation may be one strategy to improve treatment outcome in locally advanced NSCLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%