2022
DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2022.2036952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to frame the governance dimension of social innovation: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the European Union pressured the Dutch government under the EU competition directives to give market principles greater purchase. According to Musterd (2022) Cities are not only places where specific social problems are more visible but are also contexts that are supposed to serve as platforms for innovation in social policy, as is true of migration policies at the local level, for example (Campomori et al 2023). In particular, contexts with higher shares of migrants constitute fertile ground for migrant political agency, serving as battlegrounds for the acquisition of social rights (Barberis and Angelucci 2022).…”
Section: Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the European Union pressured the Dutch government under the EU competition directives to give market principles greater purchase. According to Musterd (2022) Cities are not only places where specific social problems are more visible but are also contexts that are supposed to serve as platforms for innovation in social policy, as is true of migration policies at the local level, for example (Campomori et al 2023). In particular, contexts with higher shares of migrants constitute fertile ground for migrant political agency, serving as battlegrounds for the acquisition of social rights (Barberis and Angelucci 2022).…”
Section: Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to E. Paul and S. Will Social Innovation is defined "as innovative activities and services designed to meet social needs", pursuing this idea they distinguished the following four areas: -Social innovation as a driving force of institutional change (Rodríguez-Núñez et al 2023, Campomori & Casula 2023;social innovations as new ideas, aimed at achieving social goals and satisfying social needs (Choi, N., & Majumdar, 2015); -social innovations as ideas of social good (Centre for Social Innovation, etc. ), as a new solution to social problems aimed at improving the quality of life of the whole society rather than individuals (Farzad et.…”
Section: Concept Of Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As often happens with concepts widely diffused in the public and academic debate, definitions of social innovation have flourished through the years: the variety of interpretations of this concept reflects the variety of fields of social innovation, of actors involved, and of approaches to evaluate it (for instance, see Galego et al, 2021). The vagueness and indeterminacy of this concept posed the question of finding one (or more) working definition of social innovation that could be employed in empirical research (Pol and Ville, 2009;European Commission, 2013;Grimm et al, 2013;Campomori and Casula, 2022).…”
Section: Ali and Social Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%