The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1080/13549830903102177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to facilitate (or discourage) community-based research: recommendations based on a Canadian survey

Abstract: Community-Based Research (CBR) is gaining recognition as a strategy for bridging the gaps between theory and practice and between universities and neighbouring communities. How effective is CBR and what factors have promoted and hindered its proliferation as a tool for research and capacity building? A web-based survey was conducted to investigate barriers and facilitators for CBR. CBR is hindered by the lack of resources, systemic institutional culture, and bias. Facilitators for CBR for academic and communit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the synergies between CBPR and community resilience, Brun () indicates participatory approaches have rarely been used in natural disaster research, including those focused on community resilience. Participatory approaches to research are time consuming, and when compared to more traditional research methods, they appear to be more complex because of the need to establish and maintain partnerships and to share the decision‐making processes within the project (McNiff, ; Savan, Flicker, Kolenda, & Mildenberger, ; Harkavy & Hartley, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the synergies between CBPR and community resilience, Brun () indicates participatory approaches have rarely been used in natural disaster research, including those focused on community resilience. Participatory approaches to research are time consuming, and when compared to more traditional research methods, they appear to be more complex because of the need to establish and maintain partnerships and to share the decision‐making processes within the project (McNiff, ; Savan, Flicker, Kolenda, & Mildenberger, ; Harkavy & Hartley, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Writing together is neither easy nor without its challenges. Power imbalances often come to the fore and sometimes important voices are silenced in the rush to the finish (Savan et al, 2009). Nevertheless, writing collaboratively has the potential to honour the participation and intellectual contributions of diverse team members (Castleden et al, 2010), increase productivity (Mayrath 2008) and enrich the quality of our scholarship (Flicker and Nixon, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The funding cut, unfortunately, compromised the authenticity of our relationship-building with the community in that if it was not explained to the consultation participants, it would seem like we were extracting knowledge from them without any intention of continuing a relationship. The challenge of navigating funding has been documented as a barrier of CBPR (Savan, Flicker, Kolenda, & Mildenberger, 2009). Whereas funding is not the only integral component of building relationships, it is still beneficial to acknowledge participants with food, honorariums, and support cultural protocols when working with Indigenous communities .…”
Section: Insert Table 1 Sharing Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%