2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the low-dose hormone replacement therapy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two additional trials – the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS; Hulley et al, 1998) and the estrogen replacement and atherosclerosis trial (ERA; Lakoski et al, 2005) also failed to show the protective effects of HRT in the cardiovascular system. The clinical implications of these studies are controversial and it has been suggested that perhaps lower doses of hormones and/or beginning HRT near the onset of menopause rather than years afterward may reduce the risks of HRT (Rozenbaum, 2006). Alternatively, estrogens may have protective effects earlier in life and may not be able to be used to treat cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: E2 In the Cardiovascular System And Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two additional trials – the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS; Hulley et al, 1998) and the estrogen replacement and atherosclerosis trial (ERA; Lakoski et al, 2005) also failed to show the protective effects of HRT in the cardiovascular system. The clinical implications of these studies are controversial and it has been suggested that perhaps lower doses of hormones and/or beginning HRT near the onset of menopause rather than years afterward may reduce the risks of HRT (Rozenbaum, 2006). Alternatively, estrogens may have protective effects earlier in life and may not be able to be used to treat cardiovascular disease.…”
Section: E2 In the Cardiovascular System And Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, estrogen pharmacokinetics varies among individuals. The practice of prescribing standard doses of estrogen may cause some women to be under treated, preventing them from receiving maximal benefit, whereas others may be overtreated (Rozenbaum, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 On the other hand however, when the dose-related side effect such as endometrial hyperplasia and the thromboembolic events are considered the efficacy of a long term ERT or HRT is usually discredited. [9][10][11][12][13] To improve the efficacy a lot of efforts have being given to the administration and/or the modification of estrogen. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] It is well established that osteoporosis relates not only to the decrease of the formation of osteoblast-modulated bone but also to the increase of the resorption osteoclast-modulated bone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%