2019
DOI: 10.1002/uog.20110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to determine the percentage of study subjects < 5th or > 95th centile using the control group when only the mean and standard deviation are provided

Abstract: If a diagnostic test has a significant P-value when comparing a control group with a study group (e.g. myocardial performance index, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, global sphericity index, etc.) then clinicians interested in the results may desire to know the percentage of the studied population that had abnormal values (i.e. <5 or > 95 centiles) when these data are not provided in the published study. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All study parameters were expressed as ranked Z scores with their corresponding centiles and then classified according to their normal reference ranges ( Z score < −1.65 or <5th centile = low; Z score > +1.65 or >95th centile = high) 22 . The number of fetuses (EFW <10th centile) with abnormally low or high values were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and level of statistical significance when compared to expected number (5%) from normal control fetuses (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All study parameters were expressed as ranked Z scores with their corresponding centiles and then classified according to their normal reference ranges ( Z score < −1.65 or <5th centile = low; Z score > +1.65 or >95th centile = high) 22 . The number of fetuses (EFW <10th centile) with abnormally low or high values were used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and level of statistical significance when compared to expected number (5%) from normal control fetuses (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17][18]21 All study parameters were expressed as ranked Z scores with their corresponding centiles and then classified according to their normal reference ranges (Z score < À1.65 or <5th centile = low; Z score > +1.65 or >95th centile = high). 22 The number of Area (mm) 10 Basal-apical length (mm) 11 Maximal transverse width (mm) 11 Global sphericity index 11…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UA-PI > 95 th percentile, MCA-PI < 5 th percentile and CPR < 5 th percentile were considered to be the clinically relevant cut-offs 4,5,7 . If these clinical cut-offs were not reported by the authors, they were calculated using the mean and SD for gestational age 21,22 . Variability in clinically relevant cut-off values was expressed as a percentage and was obtained by subtracting the lowest Doppler value from the highest and dividing by the highest Doppler value for each week of gestation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En 256 casos seguidos hasta el parto, con CAF obtenidos 2 a 3 semanas antes del mismo, se procedió a establecer los límites del CAF en tres grupos: a) aquellos con valor menor a 50, b) los ubicados entre 50 y 57, y c) los iguales o mayores a 58, calculando los valores de tendencia central y de peso en cada grupo. Los datos obtenidos fueron sometidos a estudio estadístico por el programa SPSS 8.0 y la calculadora DeVore (22) , que proporciona el porcentaje de sujetos del grupo control que están por debajo o por encima de los percentiles predefinidos del peso fetal en el grupo de estudio o viceversa. Los resultados obtenidos son presentados en tablas y gráficos de propósito especial.…”
Section: Materials Y Métodosunclassified