2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to consider the effects of time of day, beam strength, and snow cover in ICESat-2 based estimation of boreal forest biomass?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study's findings have drawn attention to the intriguing variation in FCC estimations between day and night segment acquisitions. The higher accuracy rates associated with night acquisitions resonate with the results from biomass estimation studies conducted by Narine et al (2019b) and Varvia et al (2022). In another study, Neuenschwander et al (2020) validated canopy and terrain heights obtained from ICESat-2 in Finland using airborne lidar data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study's findings have drawn attention to the intriguing variation in FCC estimations between day and night segment acquisitions. The higher accuracy rates associated with night acquisitions resonate with the results from biomass estimation studies conducted by Narine et al (2019b) and Varvia et al (2022). In another study, Neuenschwander et al (2020) validated canopy and terrain heights obtained from ICESat-2 in Finland using airborne lidar data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These noteworthy advantages could potentially escalate the prediction precision of specific forest stand parameters. As an illustration, several academic studies employing ICESat-2 data have discerned that data amassed during night hours can augment the predictive success in assessing aboveground biomass (Narine et al, 2019b;Varvia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, ICESat-2/ATLAS, a satellite-borne lidar system of the latest iteration, has played an increasingly important role in a number of disciplines, including measurements of ice-cover thickness and surface elevation [26,27], the dynamic monitoring of lake water levels [28], and the imaging of forest physical parameters. In the estimation and mapping of forest physical parameters, ICESat-2 data are frequently used in synergy with satellite optical imagery for forest aboveground biomass inversion [29][30][31] and tree height mapping at the regional scale [32][33][34], and have become the crucial data source for large-scale forest aboveground biomass and tree height mapping. However, no studies on forest biodiversity monitoring using the novel satellite-based LIDAR ICESat-2/ATLAS in conjunction with satellite optical remote sensing have been reported to date, and there has been little exploration of the potential of combining horizontal spectral variation and vertical structural variation features of satellite remote sensing data for application in forest tree species diversity modeling [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, laser measurements are expensive, and thus in many cases they cannot be conducted wall-to-wall but only through sample coverage [8] . Important examples include the strip samples of laser measurements conducted in Alaska [9] , and the samples of laser footprints from NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI; [1 , 10] and the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellites 1 and 2 (ICESat-1 and −2; [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] . For many of these applications, existing methods for assessing uncertainties using frameworks such as model-assisted estimation (e.g., [9] ), hybrid inference (e.g., [1 , 11] ), and hierarchical model-based inference (e.g., [10] ) have been sufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%