Algorithms in Algebraic Geometry and Applications 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9104-2_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to compute the canonical module of a set of points

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were found by F. O. Schreyer. The four first examples were known by Beck and Kreuzer [2] but the last five examples are new.…”
Section: Counterexamples To the Minimal Resolution Conjecturementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were found by F. O. Schreyer. The four first examples were known by Beck and Kreuzer [2] but the last five examples are new.…”
Section: Counterexamples To the Minimal Resolution Conjecturementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Beck and Kreuzer [2] have found a way to compute a presentation of the canonical module ω A of the coordinate ring A of a set of points using Gröbner basis techniques. By this method they have been able to find the four first counterexamples in Table I. …”
Section: Counterexamples To the Minimal Resolution Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimal resolution conjecture for a general set of γ points in P r has received considerable attention; see Eisenbud and Popescu [1999] for full references and discussion. In particular, it is known that the minimal resolution conjecture is satisfied if r ≤ 4 (Gaeta [1951] and [1995], Geramita-Lorenzini [1989], Ballico-Geramita [1986], Walter [1995], Lauze [1996]), or γ ≫ r (Hirschowitz-Simpson [1996]), but computer evidence produced by Schreyer, extended also by Mats Boij in his 1994 thesis and by Beck and Kreuzer in [1996] suggested that it might fail for certain examples starting with 11 points in P 6 . Indeed, Eisenbud and Popescu [1999] proved that if r ≥ 6, r = 9, then the minimal resolution conjecture fails for a general set of γ = r + ⌊(3 + √ 8r + 1)/2⌋ points in P r .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%