2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Complete Customer Requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, certain studies, such as Jonas et al 24 and Geierhos et al, 25 focus on semantic completeness detection in single requirements rather than detecting missing functions in the requirement set. Igor et al 26 attempted to verify documents based on the completeness of requirements, especially the software requirements specifications, and focused on the completeness of information type rather than functional information.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, certain studies, such as Jonas et al 24 and Geierhos et al, 25 focus on semantic completeness detection in single requirements rather than detecting missing functions in the requirement set. Igor et al 26 attempted to verify documents based on the completeness of requirements, especially the software requirements specifications, and focused on the completeness of information type rather than functional information.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the approaches on completeness validation or missing information detection is not involved. On the other hand, Geierhos et al [17] are concerned about the existing but incomplete single user requirements, especially the semantically incomplete predicate part. Igor et al [29] studied the completeness assessment method of requirements documents (especially the software requirements speci-fications), focusing on the completeness of information types rather than functional information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%