2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to “Capture the Future by Utilization of the Past” in the Coming Revision of China CO2 Technology Roadmap?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among which, 72% is from power stations [9]. This demonstrates that a reduction of the CO 2 emissions from the large stationary point sources is the key to realizing China's target [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among which, 72% is from power stations [9]. This demonstrates that a reduction of the CO 2 emissions from the large stationary point sources is the key to realizing China's target [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the same for CCS and CCUS projects, and some CCS exploration activities in Schleswig-Holstein and Vattenfall Janschwalde in Germany, the Belchatow project in Poland, and so on were postponed or cancelled because of the lack of public acceptance over the exploration of storage sites [185,186]. As the most unfamiliar technology to the general public in China, CCUS technology has been reluctantly accepted when compared with other low carbon technologies including wind power, solar power, energy efficiency, or biomass for reasons of climate change mitigation [10,187]. However, there is now a positive attitude towards CCUS policies in China.…”
Section: Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the significant oil displacement characteristics of CO 2 , the injection of CO 2 into oil reservoirs for storage not only significantly increases the production of oil, but is also an effective means of controlling CO 2 emissions to reduce the greenhouse effect. Among the displacement methods, CO 2 flooding and CO 2 -WAG flooding are two common displacement methods used in oilfields, CO 2 -WAG flooding is superior to CO 2 flooding in sweep efficiency and has a better effect on EOR, but the injection of fluid is more difficult [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, no matter which displacement method is used, when CO 2 is injected into the formation, a series of physical and chemical reactions (CO 2 -brine-rock interactions) are triggered, changing the physical properties of the reservoirs [10][11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%