2019
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz541
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to be fooled searching for significant variations of the b-value

Abstract: SUMMARY An unbiased estimation of the b-value and of its variability is essential to verify empirically its physical contribution to the earthquake generation process, and the capability to improve earthquake forecasting and seismic hazard. Notwithstanding the vast literature on the b-value estimation, we note that some potential sources of bias that may lead to non-physical b-value variations are too often ignored in seismological common practice. The aim of this paper is to discuss some of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is to say, the features are computed on windows of n events (with n = 200) and their value is assigned to the nth event at the time t i and windows move of one event at time (i.e., each feature represents a time series). Here, n equal to 200 was selected considering that this parameter is important for obtaining robust estimates of the b-value [60]. For instance, Dresen et al, 2020 [27], used n equal to 150.…”
Section: Features 21 Features Computation and General Working Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is to say, the features are computed on windows of n events (with n = 200) and their value is assigned to the nth event at the time t i and windows move of one event at time (i.e., each feature represents a time series). Here, n equal to 200 was selected considering that this parameter is important for obtaining robust estimates of the b-value [60]. For instance, Dresen et al, 2020 [27], used n equal to 150.…”
Section: Features 21 Features Computation and General Working Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The b‐value describes the magnitude‐frequency distribution of earthquakes, whereby a smaller value indicates a higher proportion of large earthquakes with respect to small earthquakes, and vice versa. Variations in the observed b‐value have been attributed to changes in stress conditions and/or rock heterogeneity, and fluid diffusion (Marzocchi et al., 2020).…”
Section: Moment Magnitude and Earthquake B‐valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the strong correlation between a-and b-values and that the Poisson hypothesis used in Weichert (1980) approach may be challenging in Ischia (see next Section), we further check the stability of results by estimating the b-value also independently from the annual rate. To this end, we use the method described in Taroni (2021) that allows estimating the b-value with a timevarying magnitude of completeness, including the correction for the binning of the magnitudes (in our case 0.1) and the correction for an unbiased MLE (Marzocchi et al, 2020). We obtain a b-value = 1.18 +/−0.13, very similar to the one previously estimated.…”
Section: Magnitude-frequency Distributionmentioning
confidence: 61%