Abstract:Maxillary sinus floor elevation, via the lateral approach, is one of the most predictable bone augmentation procedures performed in implant dentistry. but both intra‑ and postoperative complications can occur, and some of them are severe. Our aim is as follows:
To review the pertinent literature on the topic, especially assessing the risk factors related to complications.
To give clinical recommendations to minimize intra‑ and postoperative complications with the ultimate scope of improving the standard of cl… Show more
“…Prior to any intervention, a meticulous diagnosis, involving radiological evaluation (Panoramic exam and CT scan) and eventually otolaryngological examination when needed. 21 In general, when considering utilization of MSA, the contraindications in the field of otolaryngology pertain to conditions or anatomical variations that either currently or potentially obstruct the natural drainage of the maxillary sinus through its natural opening. Both medical conditions that affect ciliary function (such as rhinosinusitis and cystic fibrosis) and physical obstructions (like polyps and neoplasms) can hinder sinus drainage, increasing the risk of infection after a sinus graft.…”
IntroductionPatients with mucosal cysts in the maxillary sinus require special consideration in patients who require implant therapy for the restoration when undergoing implant therapy for the restoration of the posterior maxillary dentition. Treatment strategies for these clinical situations remain controversial in the literature. Thus, this study seeks to describe a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for sinus augmentation in patients with pre‐existing maxillary antral cysts.MethodsA total of 15 patients and 18 sinuses were consecutively enrolled in this cohort study and underwent maxillary antral cyst treatment by needle aspiration and simultaneous maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA). During surgical procedures, threeimplants (Zimmer Biomet, Indiana, USA) were positioned in 11 sinuses and two implants (Zimmer Biomet, Indiana, USA) were positioned in 5 sinuses.ResultsOverall implant success and survival rates were 100% and 97.8%, respectively at 1 year and 5‐year follow‐ups. Crestal bone resorption averaged 0.3 ± 0.2 mm 5‐year post‐loading, showing bone stability. Implant survival rate at 5‐year follow‐up expressed predictability of the technique comparable to historical data when MSA was performed alone. Crestal bone resorption averaged 0.3 ± 0.2 mm 5 years post‐loading and shows bone stability utilizing mucosal cyst aspiration with concomitant MSA procedures. Quality of life evaluation at 1‐week post‐op showed similar results to published historical data. In 81% (13 sinuses), the CBCT examination at 5‐year follow‐up showed no cyst reformation, in 19% (3 sinuses) cyst reformation was visible, but smaller in size when compared to the pre‐op CBCT evaluation, and all the patients were asymptomatic.ConclusionsMaxillary sinus mucosal cyst aspiration with concomitant MSA, may be a viable option to treat maxillary sinus cyst.
“…Prior to any intervention, a meticulous diagnosis, involving radiological evaluation (Panoramic exam and CT scan) and eventually otolaryngological examination when needed. 21 In general, when considering utilization of MSA, the contraindications in the field of otolaryngology pertain to conditions or anatomical variations that either currently or potentially obstruct the natural drainage of the maxillary sinus through its natural opening. Both medical conditions that affect ciliary function (such as rhinosinusitis and cystic fibrosis) and physical obstructions (like polyps and neoplasms) can hinder sinus drainage, increasing the risk of infection after a sinus graft.…”
IntroductionPatients with mucosal cysts in the maxillary sinus require special consideration in patients who require implant therapy for the restoration when undergoing implant therapy for the restoration of the posterior maxillary dentition. Treatment strategies for these clinical situations remain controversial in the literature. Thus, this study seeks to describe a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for sinus augmentation in patients with pre‐existing maxillary antral cysts.MethodsA total of 15 patients and 18 sinuses were consecutively enrolled in this cohort study and underwent maxillary antral cyst treatment by needle aspiration and simultaneous maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA). During surgical procedures, threeimplants (Zimmer Biomet, Indiana, USA) were positioned in 11 sinuses and two implants (Zimmer Biomet, Indiana, USA) were positioned in 5 sinuses.ResultsOverall implant success and survival rates were 100% and 97.8%, respectively at 1 year and 5‐year follow‐ups. Crestal bone resorption averaged 0.3 ± 0.2 mm 5‐year post‐loading, showing bone stability. Implant survival rate at 5‐year follow‐up expressed predictability of the technique comparable to historical data when MSA was performed alone. Crestal bone resorption averaged 0.3 ± 0.2 mm 5 years post‐loading and shows bone stability utilizing mucosal cyst aspiration with concomitant MSA procedures. Quality of life evaluation at 1‐week post‐op showed similar results to published historical data. In 81% (13 sinuses), the CBCT examination at 5‐year follow‐up showed no cyst reformation, in 19% (3 sinuses) cyst reformation was visible, but smaller in size when compared to the pre‐op CBCT evaluation, and all the patients were asymptomatic.ConclusionsMaxillary sinus mucosal cyst aspiration with concomitant MSA, may be a viable option to treat maxillary sinus cyst.
“…Schneiderian membrane perforation is the most common accidental intraoperative complication during sinus lift [23,24]. Factors, such as thickness and morphology of the Schneiderian membrane, anatomy of the sinus, limited residual ridge height, and sinus pathology, can increase the risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors, such as thickness and morphology of the Schneiderian membrane, anatomy of the sinus, limited residual ridge height, and sinus pathology, can increase the risk. Sinus pathology may be accompanied by poor membrane vascularity and elasticity and reduced membrane resistance to elevation [15,24]. Membrane perforation in the presence of sinus pathoses may also lead to graft contamination and sinus infection with the leakage of cystic fluid or inflammatory exudate unless the lesion is enucleated ahead of MSFA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, several studies have supported the conflicting opinion that membrane perforation is not associated with postoperative infection or implant failure, probably because of improved access for instruments and materials, and repair techniques [23,26,30]. Proper strategies to manage a perforated membrane are suggested to reduce complications [6,24,31]. Currently, intentional perforation during sinus lift is mostly indicated for the removal of implants displaced into the sinus cavity [32] and for treating sinus mucosal thickening or pathology.…”
For a large benign lesion within the maxillary sinus, such as an antral pseudocyst, maxillary sinus floor augmentation is more commonly performed using a two-stage approach. This involves first removing the lesion, and then, re-entry following several months of healing. In this case series, we described the “one-bony-window” approach, which is a technical surgical modification of the previous one-stage approach, for simultaneous cyst removal and maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Four patients with large maxillary antral pseudocysts were included. The “one-bony-window” approach involves the preparation of a large window opening of approximately 15 mm × 20 mm at the lateral wall. A mesiodistally extended intentional perforation was made in the upper part of the exposed membrane to enhance the access for instrumentation. The antral pseudocyst was removed in its entirety without being deformed to prevent rupture or leakage of the cystic contents. Subsequent detachment and elevation of the Schneiderian membrane at the sinus floor significantly reduced the perforation site, and bone grafting with implant placement was performed simultaneously. This alleviated the need to surgically repair the perforation. The lateral opening was either uncovered or repositioned using bony window lids. Healing abutments were connected after six months, and the final prosthesis was placed after two months. At the 1-year follow-up, the antral pseudocysts had resolved with no specific recurrence, and the stability of the augmented sinus was maintained with excellent implant survival. Within the limitations of our findings, the “one-bony-window” technique can be suggested for the simultaneous removal of large antral pseudocysts and maxillary sinus floor augmentation with favorable clinical outcomes.
“…26 To compensate for the lack of maxillary bone height, several bone augmentation or sinus lift techniques have been proposed. Membrane perforations represent the most common complication among these procedures, 27,28,29 with sinus infection a known risk outcome. The authors were highlighting this as something general dentists should have some awareness of as a cautionary measure.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.