2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/re.2011.6051623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to assign cost to “avoidable requirements creep”: A step towards the waterfall's agilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author has proposed a conceptual model for managers after taking interviews. The effect of the project scope is studied in various studies, and it is found that scope is as important as any other factor [27] [28] [29] [30]. Scope creep to be carried out in an adequately controlled way to overcome failure chances [26].…”
Section: Rq2 What Are the Current State-of-the-art Models Useful In Managing Scope Creep In The Agsd Context?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author has proposed a conceptual model for managers after taking interviews. The effect of the project scope is studied in various studies, and it is found that scope is as important as any other factor [27] [28] [29] [30]. Scope creep to be carried out in an adequately controlled way to overcome failure chances [26].…”
Section: Rq2 What Are the Current State-of-the-art Models Useful In Managing Scope Creep In The Agsd Context?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative research method is defined as "the systematic investigation of phenomena by gathering quantifiable data and performing statistical, mathematical or computational techniques" [74]. The results obtained from the quantitative analysis are considered reliable and objective by the majority of the experts and researchers [75].…”
Section: ) Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrences in research articles ef1-Project Priority [6], [7], [51], [77] ef2-Lack of Motivation and Direction [14], [18], [19], [66], [67], [78] ef3-Change Cost [5], [7], [8], [10], [18], [19], [47], [49], [50], [66], [69], [70], [71], [72], [74], [77], [79], [82], [83], [84], [85] ef4-Project Resources [7], [10], [67], [71], [86], [74], [80], [83], [72] ef5-Project Risks [7], [9], [10], [50], [66], [70], [77] ef6-Rework [7], [14], [19],…”
Section: Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%