How to Assess Data Availability, Accessibility and Format for Risk Analysis?

Abstract

Risk assessments are mostly carried out based on available data, which do not reflect all data theoretically required by experts to answer them. This study aimed at developing a methodology to assess data availability, accessibility and format, based on a scoring system and focusing on two diseases: Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis (VEE), still exotic to Europe, and alveolar echinococcosis, caused by Echinococcus multilocularis (EM), endemic in several Member States (MSs). After reviewing 36 opinions of the EFSA-AHAW Panel on risk assessment of animal health questions, a generic list of needed data was elaborated. The methodology consisted, first, in implementing a direct and an indirect survey to collect the data needed for both case studies: the direct survey consisted in a questionnaire sent to contact points of three European MSs (Belgium, France and the Netherlands), and the organization of a workshop gathering experts on both diseases. The indirect survey, focusing on the three MSs involved in the direct survey plus Spain, relied on web searches. Secondly, a scoring system with reference to data availability, accessibility and format was elaborated, to, finally, compare both diseases and data between MSs. The accessibility of data was generally related to their availability. Web searches resulted in more data available for VEE compared to EM, despite its current exotic status in the European Union. Hypertext markup language and portable document files were the main formats of available data. Data availability, accessibility and format should be improved for research scientists/assessors. The format of data plays a key role in the feasibility and rapidness of data management and analysis, through a prompt compilation, combination and aggregation in working databases. Harmonization of data collection process is encouraged, according to standardized procedures, to provide useful and reliable data, both at the national and the international levels for both animal and human health; it would allow assessing data gaps through comparative studies. The present methodology is a good way of assessing the relevance of data for risk assessment, as it allows integrating the uncertainty linked to the quality of data used. Such an approach could be described as transparent and traceable and should be performed systematically.

Assessing the use of animal health platforms: User’s needs, preferences and constraints

“…Therefore, although there is accessibility to certain data (e.g. by officially demanding access to international organizations) limitations in access is still high as stated in previous studies (Bellet et al, 2012;Humblet et al, 2016). Moreover, current existing databases for animal health data have not always been designed with the potential for exchange of data and accessibility to a variety of stakeholders (Humblet et al, 2016).…”

“…Data in animal health systems are crucial for epidemiological analysis and even if it is evident that there have been advances in collecting data and improvement in animal health systems (FAO, 2011; OIE, 2017), there is yet a strong need for improving data availability and accessibility; not only for decision makers but also for research scientists (Humblet et al. 2016). This is reflected in the results of this survey which showed that for the respondents, the overall main issue and constraint they indicated was in fact data accessibility and availability.…”

Assessing the use of animal health platforms: user’s needs, preferences and constraints

“…Although, there is accessibility to certain data (e.g. by officially demanding access to international organizations) respondents showed that access to databases on public and animal health, access limitation are still high (Bellet et al, 2012;EFSA, 2020;Humblet et al, 2016). Additionally this access can be hindered by the limited knowledge of computer science (translating PDF or HTLM format to EXCEL or text using text mining) or heavy manual work required by the conversion as stated by Humblet et al (2016).…”

“…Preferred forms of data where Excel and PDF, but as stated by Humblet et al (2016), the main forms of data they found were PDF and HTLM files. Although raw tabulated data (e.g.…”

“…Risk assessment plays an important role in in risk of introduction of animal diseases. These are mostly carried out based on available data and an animal health information system is only as good as the data it contains (FAO, 2011;Humblet et al, 2016). However, most of the data required to fully evaluate the extent of a health issue, are generally not available or non-existent.…”