2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to apply Markov chains for modeling sequential edit patterns in collaborative ontology-engineering projects

Abstract: With the growing popularity of large-scale collaborative ontologyengineering projects, such as the creation of the 11 th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, we need new methods and insights to help project-and community-managers to cope with the constantly growing complexity of such projects. In this paper, we present a novel application of Markov chains to model sequential usage patterns that can be found in the change-logs of collaborative ontology-engineering projects. We provide a det… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, depending on the category of user [5], as well as his previous browsing behavior, repository developers could provide suggestions on other relevant ontology classes using collaborative filtering algorithms. Similarly, using recurrent neural networks or markov chains [19], repository developers could use the interaction datasets to predict the consequent ontology class the user is likely going to navigate. These predictions and suggestions could then be provided through interactive navigation links.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, depending on the category of user [5], as well as his previous browsing behavior, repository developers could provide suggestions on other relevant ontology classes using collaborative filtering algorithms. Similarly, using recurrent neural networks or markov chains [19], repository developers could use the interaction datasets to predict the consequent ontology class the user is likely going to navigate. These predictions and suggestions could then be provided through interactive navigation links.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, Wang et al [18] applied association-rule mining to the change-logs of several different collaborative ontology-engineering projects to extract edit patterns, which were then used to predict the next change actions in the corresponding projects. Similarly, Walk et al [19, 20, 21] used (higher-order) Markov chains to study user-editing trails of ontology-engineering projects to predict the action a user is most likely to conduct next. Pesquita et al [22] leveraged the location and specific structural features of edit trails to show that these features can be used to determine where the next change is going to take place in the Gene Ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2013, Wang et al [18] applied association-rule mining to the change-logs of several different collaborative ontology-engineering projects to extract edit patterns, which were then used to predict the next change actions in the corresponding projects. Similarly, Walk et al [19,20,21] used (higher-order) Markov chains to study user-editing trails of ontologyengineering projects to predict the action a user is most likely to conduct next. Pesquita et al [22] leveraged the location and specific structural features of edit trails to show that these features can be used to determine where the next change is going to take place in the Gene Ontology.…”
Section: Log Analysis To Characterize User Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there has been increasing interest on analyzing and categorizing human sequences in the past, including mobility [5], page access [7,12], edit [28,30,31] as well as click stream logs [24]. Additionally, Markov models of various orders have been employed [2,15,20,4,22,29] to model and predict clicks or interactions of users on the (Semantic) Web.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%