1998
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Acquire a Concept

Abstract: In this paper, I develop a novel account of concept acquisition for an atomistic theory of concepts. Conceptual atomism is rarely explored in cognitive science because of the feeling that atomistic treatments of concepts are inherently nativistic. My model illustrates, on the contrary, that atomism does not preclude the learning of a concept.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 For example, Margolis (1998) and Fodor (2008) acknowledge that stereotypes might be "sustaining mechanisms" involved in the acquisition and even application of concepts, but still deny that stereotypes are constituents of concepts. This same view was also defended in a very influential paper by Rey (1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 For example, Margolis (1998) and Fodor (2008) acknowledge that stereotypes might be "sustaining mechanisms" involved in the acquisition and even application of concepts, but still deny that stereotypes are constituents of concepts. This same view was also defended in a very influential paper by Rey (1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another concept acquisition approach is offered by Eric Margolis (1998), and is indeed later endorsed by Fodor himself (LOT2 2008). It was the hope of Margolis to appease the tensions between Lexical Concept Nativism and Lexical Concept Empiricism, and it was his hope to do so by describing a process for the acquisition of representationally simple concepts.…”
Section: Neither Rupert Nor Margolis Meets Fodor's Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, files are not constitutive of concepts-on the Fodorian view concepts are strictly atomic LOT symbols. Nevertheless, concepts might have complex representational content (as most of them do) which might be accessible for further cognitive processing via the associated files if those are not empty (Margolis, 1999).…”
Section: Fodorian Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%