2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1270735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Timely are Earnings When Costs are Sticky? Implications for the Link between Conditional Conservatism and Cost Stickiness*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, Malik (2012) believed that managers' optimistic expectations also lead to operational stickiness. Optimistic managers are more likely to keep excessive operational factors to cope with increased demand because they tend to regard the demand decline as a temporary situation (Homburg and Nasev, 2008;Kama and Weiss, 2013). Additionally, agency theory shows that managers tend to make decisions beneficial to their own interests.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, Malik (2012) believed that managers' optimistic expectations also lead to operational stickiness. Optimistic managers are more likely to keep excessive operational factors to cope with increased demand because they tend to regard the demand decline as a temporary situation (Homburg and Nasev, 2008;Kama and Weiss, 2013). Additionally, agency theory shows that managers tend to make decisions beneficial to their own interests.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, managers' optimistic expectations about future growth may lead them to avoid reducing operational factors during the period of demand decreasing (Malik, 2012). If managers are optimistic that current demand declines are temporary, demand will rise in the short term, they are more likely choose to keep or maintain excessive operational factors to cope with increased demand and implement sticky operational management (Homburg and Nasev, 2008;Kama and Weiss, 2013). Additionally, the lack of management experience is also an important cause of sticky management.…”
Section: Operational Stickinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, regardless of whether the company belongs to the efficient or inefficient cost stickiness subgroup, it has a negative impact on the current profit (decline in sales year-by-year), because the decline in sales is not compensated by the same amount of reduction in costs. But the cost stickiness of efficient companies will have a positive impact on future profits (due to a rebound in sales as positive news), and inefficient firms have a negative impact on future profits (due to the permanent decline in sales as negative news) (Homburg and Nasev, 2010).…”
Section: The Concept Of Cost Stickinessmentioning
confidence: 99%