2016
DOI: 10.1086/686262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the Timing of Grade Retention Affects Outcomes: Identification and Estimation of Time-Varying Treatment Effects

Abstract: Increasingly, grade retention is viewed as an important alternative to social promotion, yet evidence to date is unable to disentangle how the effect of grade retention varies by abilities and over time. The key challenge is differential selection of students into retention across grades and by abilities. Because existing quasi-experimental methods cannot address this question, we develop a new strategy that is a hybrid between a control function and a generalization of the fixed effects approach. Applying our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
87
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
87
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach fits into the aforementioned FADM and is, hence, most comparable to the work of Fruehwirth et al (2016;henceforth FNT) and Gary-Bobo et al (2016;henceforth GGR). A key assumption in this approach is that unobserved determinants of both treatment and outcomes are assumed to be captured by a low-dimensional set of common causes (FNT,p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our approach fits into the aforementioned FADM and is, hence, most comparable to the work of Fruehwirth et al (2016;henceforth FNT) and Gary-Bobo et al (2016;henceforth GGR). A key assumption in this approach is that unobserved determinants of both treatment and outcomes are assumed to be captured by a low-dimensional set of common causes (FNT,p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A variety of studies have also found that retention is associated with an increased likelihood of dropping out (Jimerson et al, 2002;Roderick, 1994;Rumberger 1987). Furthermore, one of the primary criticisms of grade retention is that it disrupts a student's peer and cohort group, and potentially affects their socioemotional development (Fruehwirth, Navarro, & Takahashi, 2011;Shepard & Smith, 1990).…”
Section: The Policy and Practice Of Grade Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies find increases in scores following the introduction of high-stakes testing (Greene & Winters, 2007, Jacob & Lefgren, 2004; however, there is evidence that these effects fade over time (Allen, Chen, Willson, & Hughes, 2009, Schwerdt, West, & Winters, 2017. Other authors find negative net effects on performance (Roderick & Nagaoka, 2005, Fruehwirth, Navarro, & Takahashi, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%