PsycEXTRA Dataset 2004
DOI: 10.1037/e537052012-125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the Spread of the Neighborhood Influences Spoken Word Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has shown that words consisting of common phonological representations are produced faster and more accurately than words containing infrequent sound structures (e.g., Vitevitch, 2002;Vitevitch, Armbrüster, & Chu, 2004;Vitevitch & Luce, 2005). The most prevalent measures used in English are phonotactic probability (the probability of phonemes or phoneme combinations in specific word positions) and phonological neighbourhood density (the network of words sharing all but one phoneme), both of which have been shown to influence the efficiency of speech production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown that words consisting of common phonological representations are produced faster and more accurately than words containing infrequent sound structures (e.g., Vitevitch, 2002;Vitevitch, Armbrüster, & Chu, 2004;Vitevitch & Luce, 2005). The most prevalent measures used in English are phonotactic probability (the probability of phonemes or phoneme combinations in specific word positions) and phonological neighbourhood density (the network of words sharing all but one phoneme), both of which have been shown to influence the efficiency of speech production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%