2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the network properties of shareholders vary with investor type and country

Abstract: We construct two examples of shareholder networks in which shareholders are connected if they have shares in the same company. We do this for the shareholders in Turkish companies and we compare this against the network formed from the shareholdings in Dutch companies. We analyse the properties of these two networks in terms of the different types of shareholder. We create a suitable randomised version of these networks to enable us to find significant features in our networks. For that we find the roles playe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Similar behaviours are observed for shareholder networks for Netherlands and Turkey [3]. The universal behaviours of the complex networks may emerge due to some common mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. Similar behaviours are observed for shareholder networks for Netherlands and Turkey [3]. The universal behaviours of the complex networks may emerge due to some common mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…To account for local interactions, we propose a different model, which is based on the random walks rewiring of networks consisting of different types of nodes. We show that the model reproduces the main statistical characteristics of real-world systems: the emergence of scaling of communities and percolation properties, the distribution of average shortest path and the dependence of above properties on the types of nodes in the data, especially the results in the work of Shareholder networks [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we assume that graph evolution follows this pairwise mechanism, we can estimate values p(s) and q(s) for the parameters p and q respectively by looking at how links changed over one time step, i.e., from the edge set E (s − 1) in G (s − 1) to edge set E (s) of G (s) . Formally we have that This gives us our pairwise model prediction for the triplet transition matrix T (pw) (s) , where we substitute p(s) from (6) and q(s) from (5) for p and q in T (pw) 51 . The nodes are shareholders in Turkish companies and two shareholders are linked if they both hold shares in the same company in one year.…”
Section: Evidence For Higher Order Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investor decisions on which the country chooses for investment depend on a number of different factors ranging from the price of the labour force, availability of the requisite competences, the country's geopolitical location, the tax system, intensity of market competition, and political stability in the country [59][60][61] to lobbying [62,63], managerial discretion [64], clusters, and networking [65]. All these factors are in line with the investment attractiveness concept.…”
Section: Investment Attractiveness: a Smartness Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%