2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the molecular structure determines the flow of excitation energy in plant light-harvesting complex II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
157
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
21
157
0
Order By: Relevance
“…57 The time-scale for the Chlb/Chla transfer obtained by both methods differs by one order of magnitude. 27,32,[34][35][36][37] The combined Förster-Redfield theory requires an empirical parameter M cr for separating the exciton Hamiltonian between a strongly coupled part H strong ex with all off-diagonal elements set to zero except those |J mn | > M cr and the remaining weakly coupled sites. 58 Suggested values for LHC II are M cr = 20 cm −1 or smaller.…”
Section: Influence Of the Vibrational Peaks On The Transport In Lhc IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…57 The time-scale for the Chlb/Chla transfer obtained by both methods differs by one order of magnitude. 27,32,[34][35][36][37] The combined Förster-Redfield theory requires an empirical parameter M cr for separating the exciton Hamiltonian between a strongly coupled part H strong ex with all off-diagonal elements set to zero except those |J mn | > M cr and the remaining weakly coupled sites. 58 Suggested values for LHC II are M cr = 20 cm −1 or smaller.…”
Section: Influence Of the Vibrational Peaks On The Transport In Lhc IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,30,31 However, 2d echo-spectra are more susceptible to vibrational modes and reflect both, electronic and vibrational effects. 10 Due to the lack of computational capabilities, energy-transfer in LHC II had been previously calculated only with approximate methods [32][33][34] with non-conclusive results for the transfer timescales. The predictions for the relaxation time differ by more than one order of magnitude 27,32,[35][36][37] from the results of Renger et al 34 Approximate methods work best in specific limits of delocalized (Redfield type) or incoherent dynamics (Förster transfer), or alternatively try to interpolate between the two cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, the "bottleneck" state was assumed to be on Chl 604, 5,35 but calculations by Renger et al 8 predict, on one hand, red-shifted Chl 604 and, on the other hand, slow energy transfer (tens of ps) from Chl 613/614. It remains a possibility, albeit unlikely, that in aggregates, fast energy transfer (∼3 ps time scale) occurs from the peripherally positioned Chl 613/614 pair to Chls on the nearest neighbour complex.…”
Section: On the Identity Of The Intermediate Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 In addition, modelling the excitonic couplings and site energies of the 14 chlorophylls (Chls) based on the crystal structure 2,4 has been used to predict the downhill Chl energy transfer routes and ultrafast dynamics. [5][6][7][8][9] In addition to the light-harvesting function, LHCII is involved in the non-radiative dissipation of excess excitation energy, a process collectively referred to as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of Chl fluorescence, [10][11][12] a key mechanism for protection against photodamage under excess radiation levels. In vitro, significant quenching manifested in shortening a) Electronic mail: lambrev@brc.hu b) Electronic mail: howesiang@ntu.edu.sg of the Chl a excitation lifetime [13][14][15][16] and development of a farred emitting state 17,18 are observed upon protein aggregation of LHCII.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%