2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2018.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the inter-electronic potential Ansätze affect the bound state solutions of a planar two-electron quantum dot model

Abstract: The model of a two-electron quantum dot, confined to move in a two dimensional flat space, in the presence of an external harmonic oscillator potential, is revisited for a specific purpose. Indeed, eigenvalues and eigenstates of the bound state solutions are obtained for any oscillation frequency considering both the 1/r and ln r Ansätze for inter-electronic Coulombic-like potentials in 2D. Then, it is pointed out that the significative difference between measurable quantities predicted from these two potentia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wave functions, obtained in Figure 2, are similar to those found in Ref. [23,30]. They corroborate the conclusion that the topological photon mass plays an important role in system dynamics.…”
Section: Discussion and Final Remarkssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The wave functions, obtained in Figure 2, are similar to those found in Ref. [23,30]. They corroborate the conclusion that the topological photon mass plays an important role in system dynamics.…”
Section: Discussion and Final Remarkssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We should remember that, over the recent past years, planar physics and truly two-dimensional systems have attracted a great deal of attention in connection with graphene [19][20][21], and with the Quantum Hall Effect [22,23]. All these planar quantum systems point to considering that the correct Coulomb inter-electronic potential should be ln(r) [24], rather than assuming the validity of the usual 3D dependence in planar systems, corresponding to the 1/r potential [25][26][27][28]. This brings us to our general motivation: why should one investigate the 2D μCF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which choice should we made? This question and their implications were discussed in another paper by the authors [20]. Our point of view is that anyway one should expect to have experimental data in order to compare them to the predictions of both models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%