I wish to thank Armand D'Angour for the extraordinary generosity he showed at the end of the summer of 2005 when I first gave him parts and then the whole of this essay as it was evolving, abetted in no small part by lively exchanges with him. I am also grateful to John Franklin, Richard Janko, and to an anonymous reader for detailed comments, suggestions, and face-saving corrections, which I have tried to incorporate as best I could. Finally, thanks to Miriam Griffin for her editorial guidance. 1 See Privitera, Laso di Ermione, a full-length study, with fragments and discussion; GMW 1, s.v. 'Lasus' in the index; West, Ancient Greek Music, 342-3, for a convenient summary of Lasus' achievements; and D'Angour, 'Dithyramb' for a striking reappraisal of some of the key evidence. 2 West, Ancient Greek Music, 40. 3 See G. Perec, 'Histoire du lipogramme', in Oulipo (Association) (ed.), La Littérature potentielle (créations, re-créations, récréations) (Paris, 1988), 73-89, esp. 77-8 (on Lasus). 4 'Oulipo' is an acronym for 'Ouvroir de littérature potentielle' ('Workshop of Potential Literature'), a literary movement founded in 1960 by R. Queneau and F. Le Lionnais in the name of the unlimited production of literature under limiting constraints. Other members have included M. Duchamp, I. Calvino and G. Perec. See their site: http://www.oulipo.net/. 5 Ath. 11.467a = fr. 87 Wehrli. 2 JAMES I. PORTER 6 Comp. 14; trans. Usher. 7 Fr. 70b Snell-Maehler; trans. after GMW 1.59-60. 8 Cf. D'Angour, 'Dithyramb', 338 and 342. 9 'In song' is surely wrong; that would be , vel sim. See also Privitera, Laso di Ermione, 31: 'fu usata nella melopea' (his other variant misrenders ; cf. n. 21, below.) 16 PMG 702 = Ath. 14.624e.