2015
DOI: 10.1177/2168479014567323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the Critical Path Initiative Addresses CDER’s Regulatory Science Needs: Some Illustrative Examples

Abstract: Since 2008, the Critical Path Initiative has supported FDA's program of intramural research projects in regulatory science, with the goal of improving translation of advances in emerging sciences to the development of safe and effective medical products. Since 2011, the research of FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), including the work supported by the Critical Path Initiative, has been guided by the regulatory science needs identified in the CDER science and research needs report. In this re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this issue of TIRS , we have an article by Drs M. Geanacopoulos and R. Barratt from the Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at FDA. 1 They examine the role of the Critical Path Initiative in supporting regulatory science. They provide insight into 5 diverse projects that FDA undertook to address important scientific questions requiring data to support regulatory decision making, and they discuss the processes of defining the need for data-driven approaches and how such activities can be used in the regulatory milieu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this issue of TIRS , we have an article by Drs M. Geanacopoulos and R. Barratt from the Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at FDA. 1 They examine the role of the Critical Path Initiative in supporting regulatory science. They provide insight into 5 diverse projects that FDA undertook to address important scientific questions requiring data to support regulatory decision making, and they discuss the processes of defining the need for data-driven approaches and how such activities can be used in the regulatory milieu.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%