2018
DOI: 10.1108/pm-05-2017-0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How the 2007 global financial crisis changed the financial disclosure behavior

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the 2007 global financial crisis (GFC) changed financial disclosure behavior using a sample of US equity real estate investment trusts (REITs) from 2000 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach The authors use panel data spanning from 2000 to 2015 to examine the impact of the GFC on REITs’ earnings management (EM) after controlling for other factors (including the market shock in 2007 and 2008). The measurements of EM are estimated by using the models devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where "EM" stands for the absolute term of AEM and REM measurements in the natural log, and the coefficient "β 1 " is the estimated impact of having REIT status on EM measurements. The choice of control variables " , ' i t x " is consistent with previous literature (Ambrose & Bian, 2010;Anglin et al, 2013;Liang & Dong, 2018;Liang & Dong, 2014;Liang et al, 2021) and they include total asset "Size," leverage ratio "LVR," change in operating income "ChangeOI," the market-to-book value "MTB, " change of revenue "ChangeREV," change of total asset size "Change-Size," cash from Operation "CFO," and a dummy variable indicating if the firm suffers from loss "Dloss." We also include dummy variables "DGFC" and "IFRS" to control for the impact of GFC and IFRS adoption.…”
Section: Different Earnings Management Between Reits and Non-reit Lpcssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…where "EM" stands for the absolute term of AEM and REM measurements in the natural log, and the coefficient "β 1 " is the estimated impact of having REIT status on EM measurements. The choice of control variables " , ' i t x " is consistent with previous literature (Ambrose & Bian, 2010;Anglin et al, 2013;Liang & Dong, 2018;Liang & Dong, 2014;Liang et al, 2021) and they include total asset "Size," leverage ratio "LVR," change in operating income "ChangeOI," the market-to-book value "MTB, " change of revenue "ChangeREV," change of total asset size "Change-Size," cash from Operation "CFO," and a dummy variable indicating if the firm suffers from loss "Dloss." We also include dummy variables "DGFC" and "IFRS" to control for the impact of GFC and IFRS adoption.…”
Section: Different Earnings Management Between Reits and Non-reit Lpcssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The control variable "X " represents REITs' financial information using return on assets ("ROA"), a dummy variable on whether a REIT suffers a financial loss ("DLoss"), firm size ("Size") by logged total assets, and leverage ratio ("Leverage"), and the amount of acquisition scaled by the total asset ("Acquisition") to account for the other strategic actions undertaken by a REIT that may affect its CSR engagement at a specific point in time. The choice of these control variables is consistent with the previous literature [68][69][70]. We include country-fixed effect to control for the diversity of jurisdiction and countries (δ c ).…”
Section: Empirical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, Liang and Dong (2018) indicate that greater transparency forces REITs to adopt more conservative strategies in handling accruals on financial reports and engage in more real earnings management through the manipulation of business activities and decide to adopt these values as a proxy for REITs' financial disclosure.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%