2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
0
17

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(46 reference statements)
4
46
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Reference [42] define attitude as; "Any opinion or belief that includes an evaluation of some objects, person, or event along a continuum from negative to positive and that predispose us to act in certain ways towards that object, person or event" (p. 588). What is suggested here is that attitude influence a person's way of thinking, feeling and general behaviour.…”
Section: Learners' Attitude Towards Constructivist Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference [42] define attitude as; "Any opinion or belief that includes an evaluation of some objects, person, or event along a continuum from negative to positive and that predispose us to act in certain ways towards that object, person or event" (p. 588). What is suggested here is that attitude influence a person's way of thinking, feeling and general behaviour.…”
Section: Learners' Attitude Towards Constructivist Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V kontrastu k tomu jsou za "klučičí" předměty pokládány přírodní vědy, matematika a tělesná výchova. Chlapci i dívky jsou motivovanější, ochotněj-ší pracovat a mnohdy i úspěšnější v těch předmětech, které jsou v souladu s jejich genderovou identitou ( Jurik, Gröschner, & Seidel, 2013).…”
Section: Role Genderu Ve šKolní Výkonnosti žáKůunclassified
“…However, several studies report tight communication structures in the classroom, where teachers ask narrow-focused questions and students can only provide short answers instead of rich scientific argumentations in a dialogic setting (Hugener et al, 2009;Jurik, Gröschner, & Seidel, 2013;Osborne et al, 2013). This interaction pattern places students at a risk of not being provided learning opportunities that allow the acquisition of knowledge and deep understanding (Alexander, 2005) and that awake young people's interest in a career in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), which is in demand (OECD, 2007).…”
Section: Classroom Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One tool to do so is asking cognitively activating questions that challenge students to think profoundly and to use reasoning skills (Alexander, 2005;Lee & Kinzie, 2012;Wragg & Brown, 2001). Such questions prevent science from appearing to be a rigid body of knowledge (Duschl & Osborne, 2002) that can be correctly answered with one key word (Jurik et al, 2013;Mercer & Dawes, 2014). Oliveira (2010) states that questions that only allow students to give one correct key word come with students' expectations that in case of failure the teacher would provide them with the correct answer anyway.…”
Section: Productive Classroom Dialogue: a Learning Setting That Fostementioning
confidence: 99%