2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How stable is quantitative MRI? – Assessment of intra- and inter-scanner-model reproducibility using identical acquisition sequences and data analysis programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
55
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean values of MT, PD, R1, and R2* (Figure 11) were generally in line with values published by Gracien et al (2019); Gringel et al (2009); Hagiwara et al (2018); Krauss et al (2015); Weiskopf et al (2013). Relaxation (R1, R2*) values deviated by 0.3–10.9% from the values reported in Weiskopf et al (2013) in GM, WM, caudate nucleus (CN), and the corpus callosum (CC).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mean values of MT, PD, R1, and R2* (Figure 11) were generally in line with values published by Gracien et al (2019); Gringel et al (2009); Hagiwara et al (2018); Krauss et al (2015); Weiskopf et al (2013). Relaxation (R1, R2*) values deviated by 0.3–10.9% from the values reported in Weiskopf et al (2013) in GM, WM, caudate nucleus (CN), and the corpus callosum (CC).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…PD values differed by 3.7–13.6% from those reported in Krauss et al (2015), considering the same ROIs. For R1, and R2* we achieved deviations between 0.3 and 21.2%, and between 1.5 and 3.8% for PD compared with Gracien et al (2019), taking only GM and WM mean values into account. MT values differed between 11 and 22% from values reported in Gringel et al (2009), whereas the deviation was only about 10% from Hagiwara et al (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a previous study showed that a similar protocol yielded accurate T 2 mapping with a scan-rescan deviation of about only 1.5%. 26 For FCD definition, conventional FLAIR datasets were obtained with the following acquisition parameters: matrix size = 256 × 220 × 160, isotropic resolution = 1 mm, field of view = 256 × 220 × 160 mm 3 , TE = 353 msec, TR = 5000 msec, inversion time (TI) = 1800 msec, bandwidth = 930 Hz/pixel, duration = 7 minutes 12 seconds.…”
Section: Mri Acquisition and T 2 Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%