How stable are quantitative sensory testing measurements over time? Report on 10-week reliability and agreement of results in healthy volunteers

Abstract

BackgroundQuantitative sensory testing (QST) is a diagnostic tool for the assessment of the somatosensory system. To establish QST as an outcome measure for clinical trials, the question of how similar the measurements are over time is crucial. Therefore, long-term reliability and limits of agreement of the standardized QST protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain were tested.MethodsQST on the lower back and hand dorsum (dominant hand) were assessed twice in 22 healthy volunteers (10 males and 12 females; mean age: 46.6±13.0 years), with sessions separated by 10.0±2.9 weeks. All measurements were performed by one investigator. To investigate long-term reliability and agreement of QST, differences between the two measurements, correlation coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland–Altman plots (limits of agreement), and standard error of measurement were used.ResultsMost parameters of the QST were reliable over 10 weeks in healthy volunteers: Almost-perfect ICCs were observed for heat pain threshold (hand) and mechanical pain sensitivity (back). Substantial ICCs were observed for heat pain threshold (back), pressure pain threshold (back), mechanical pain sensitivity (hand), and vibration detection threshold (back and hand). Some QST parameters, such as cold detection threshold, exhibited low ICCs, but also very low variability. Generally, QST measures exhibited narrow limits of agreement in the Bland–Altman plots.ConclusionThe standardized QST protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain is feasible to be used in treatment trials. Moreover, defining a statistically meaningful change is possible, which is a prerequisite for the use of QST in clinical trials as well as in long-term investigations of disease progression.

Intensity‐dependent effects of aerobic training on pressure pain threshold in overweight men: A randomized trial

“…First, we did not include a control group, so the effect of HIIT and MICT on PPT cannot be discerned from any change in PPT that may have occurred naturally over time. However, PPTs show good test‐retest reliability over weeks to months in pain‐free adults (Marcuzzi et al., ; Nothnagel et al., ), so the lack of a control group in this study is unlikely to have influenced the results. Second, the experimenters who assessed PPT were not blinded to the participant's study group allocation, which could have influenced the results through observer bias.…”

Sensitive skin can be small fibre neuropathy: results from a case-control quantitative sensory testing study

“…Interestingly, they found a sensitivity to HP in 93% of patients with SFN . Using QST is interesting, as the results are reproducible over time …”

Reproducibility of a battery of human evoked pain models to detect pharmacological effects of analgesic drugs

“…A combination of approaches has been used, including an assessment of test-retest reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient and the level of agreement (Cathcart & Pritchard, 2006;Geber et al, 2011;Gelber et al, 1995;Nothnagel et al, 2017;Shy et al, 2003;Siao & Cros, 2003). Reliability analysis has also been used widely, generally yielding high reliability among results (Agostinho et al, 2009;Alappattu, Bishop, Bialosky, George, & Robinson, 2011;Geber et al, 2011;Gehling et al, 2016;Heldestad, Linder, Sellersjo, & Nordh, 2010;Knutti, Suter, & Opsommer, 2014;Lowenstein, Jesse, & Kenton, 2008;Moloney, Hall, & Doody, 2012;Moloney, Hall, O'Sullivan, & Doody, 2011;Nothnagel et al, 2017;Wylde, Palmer, Learmonth, & Dieppe, 2011). The aim of our study was to measure consistency of the profile of two analgesic drugs using our pain test battery.…”