How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?

Abstract

Much of the work done by faculty at both public and private universities has significant public dimensions: it is often paid for by public funds; it is often aimed at serving the public good; and it is often subject to public evaluation. To understand how the public dimensions of faculty work are valued, we analyzed review, promotion, and tenure documents from a representative sample of 129 universities in the US and Canada. Terms and concepts related to public and community are mentioned in a large portion of documents, but mostly in ways that relate to service, which is an undervalued aspect of academic careers. Moreover, the documents make significant mention of traditional research outputs and citation-based metrics: however, such outputs and metrics reward faculty work targeted to academics, and often disregard the public dimensions. Institutions that seek to embody their public mission could therefore work towards changing how faculty work is assessed and incentivized.

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) — A multi-actor qualitative study on success in science

“…Applicability of research findings, public engagement, science communication, open access, and feasibility would be at the heart of this objective. But in practice,research assessments often neglect societal benefits(22). Our interviewees offered polarised views on this topic, with some valuing and others downgrading science communication.…”

The role of Web of Science publications in China’s tenure system

“…Such trends are not entirely specific to Chinese universities, however. As shown by Alperin et al (2019), a high percentage of North American universities (40%) also discuss bibliometric indicators in their tenure policies, and research is generally more highly valued than teaching. However, what makes the Chinese case specific is that tenure could be obtained exclusively on bibliometric indicators, and that this path to tenure is formalized in university policies.…”

From intent to implementation: Factors affecting public involvement in life science research

“…Despite the challenges highlighted here, citizen science efforts have been growing in terms of number of projects [74], outcomes in terms of publications [74], and the number or resources available to researchers and members of the public alike including open source, peer reviewed journals on citizen science and public and patient involvement [75][76][77][78]. Our results emphasize the need for integration and incentivization of the use of these resources by institutions and funding agencies to maximize researcher's interests in public involvement [69]. Effective change towards a more open and inclusive model of life sciences will require more than just training and funding.…”

“…This highlights that simply providing training and resources for public involvement, without implementing changes in the science career pathways, may have limited benefit at an early career stage [69].…”