2016
DOI: 10.1080/1357650x.2016.1192186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How should we test infant handedness?

Abstract: As soon as infants grasp objects, they exhibit some degree of hand preference. Although all studies agree that the number of non-lateralized infants remains high during the first months of life, there is no consensus on the percentage of right- and left-handed infants. Reasons might be the different formulae used to calculate an handedness index, the basis on which handedness categories are distinguished, and the number of trials per session. In this study we aimed to provide a valid method of testing handedne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, it enables better discrimination of laterality both within and between participants and both within and between behavioural categories. The relevance of this formula is supported by a recent study of infant handedness [64]. Following Fagard et al [39], we used [−100 to −90; −89.9 to −30; −29.9 to +30; +30.1 to +89.9; +90 to +100] as ranges of LI scores to classify participants as strong left-lateralized, mixed left-lateralized, ambidextrous, mixed right-lateralized and strong right-lateralized, respectively.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In turn, it enables better discrimination of laterality both within and between participants and both within and between behavioural categories. The relevance of this formula is supported by a recent study of infant handedness [64]. Following Fagard et al [39], we used [−100 to −90; −89.9 to −30; −29.9 to +30; +30.1 to +89.9; +90 to +100] as ranges of LI scores to classify participants as strong left-lateralized, mixed left-lateralized, ambidextrous, mixed right-lateralized and strong right-lateralized, respectively.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Consequently, trending right‐handers could be one reason why some studies fail to replicate effects or find negligible effects when assessing the relation between handedness and extra‐domain factors. Methodology, period in developmental time, and choice of manual behavior are not standard across the literature (Michel, 2021; Nelson & Gonzalez, 2020) and procedures can vary how children's handedness is classified (Campbell, Marcinowski, Latta, et al., 2015; Fagard et al., 2017). Depending on the age at which a preference is assessed, and criteria used, trending right‐handers could easily be lumped into stable preference groups, infants exhibiting no hand preference, or any of the toddler hand preference groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The palmar grasp reflex can be stimulated by moving an object distally along the palm. The right hand is more dominant than the left hand in the palmar grasp reflex in newborns (Fagard et al, 2017). At the beginning of the bath, the researcher moved their index finger distally along the palm of the baby’s right hand, thereby stimulating the palmar grasp reflex.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%