2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Should I Manage a Challenging Aortic Prosthesis Angle During Valve-in-Valve Implantation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another recent study that compared different types of self-expanding valves showed that the 49° greater horizontal aorta was a modifying factor in the association between the type of self-expanding valve and the success of the device ( 2 ). There are case reports of valve-in-valve TAVR with complex anatomy, such as a horizontal aorta and an aortic aneurysm, that used a snare catheter to obtain satisfactory results ( 3 , 4 , 5 ). Therefore, we concluded that the snare catheter technique could be used in cases with complex aortic anatomy with aortic root angulations 48°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent study that compared different types of self-expanding valves showed that the 49° greater horizontal aorta was a modifying factor in the association between the type of self-expanding valve and the success of the device ( 2 ). There are case reports of valve-in-valve TAVR with complex anatomy, such as a horizontal aorta and an aortic aneurysm, that used a snare catheter to obtain satisfactory results ( 3 , 4 , 5 ). Therefore, we concluded that the snare catheter technique could be used in cases with complex aortic anatomy with aortic root angulations 48°.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%