Dyspepsia drains a substantial proportion of healthcare resources in industrialized countries and an appropriate management strategy is needed. An aetiological role for Helicobacter pylori infection has been demonstrated in a number of pathological conditions associated with dyspepsia, such as peptic ulcer and gastric malignancies, but not in functional dyspepsia. Endoscopy and diagnosis-based treatment, H. pylori testing and eradication therapy, history taking and empirical therapy, are the main tools that are currently available for managing patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Endoscopy identi®es malignancies and organic diseases of the proximal gut and therefore provides reassurance to both doctors and patients. It should be recommended in older patients with suspicious symptoms and it has proven to be more cost-effective than empirical H 2 -receptor antagonists in patients with ulcer-like symptoms. Empirical eradication in all dyspeptics without suspicious symptoms is a costeffective approach that cures the majority of peptic ulcers. Nevertheless, it does not control symptoms in the majority of patients, it may exacerbate gastrooesophageal re¯ux disease, and it encourages antibiotic resistance. The realities of current clinical practice require empirical therapy in most, if not all, the dyspeptics seen by general practitioners. A detailed history taking can help to diagnose gastro-oesophageal re¯ux disease and to identify suspicious symptoms. Furthermore, identi®cation of dyspepsia subgroups may provide guidance for empirical therapy. Nevertheless, even analysis of individual symptoms does not provide a suf®cient diagnostic yield to differentiate functional from organic dyspepsia and appropriate investigations are needed in patients with poor response to short-term therapy or frequent relapses.
I N T R O D U C T I O NDyspepsia is an important and demanding clinical problem. The syndrome affects 20±40% of the population of industrialized countries and, despite the fact that only 20±25% of affected individuals seek medical help, it accounts for 5% of the everyday workload of general practitioners.1 Therefore, dyspepsia drains a substantial proportion of healthcare resources and an appropriate management strategy is needed. In patients who have not undergone diagnostic tests, dyspepsia is termed uninvestigated'.Dyspepsia can be secondary to a variety of organic, systemic and metabolic diseases, but in most cases no potential cause of symptoms is identi®ed even after extensive investigations. Dyspepsia in these cases is termed`functional' or`idiopathic'.`Non-ulcer dyspepsia' is an alternative term that can be misleading, since some doctors and investigators believe that functional dyspepsia should include only patients with symptoms suggestive of gastric or duodenal ulcer (namely different types of epigastric pain), in the absence of an ulcer crater at endoscopy. In patients complaining of dyspepsia who have not undergone diagnostic tests, dyspepsia is termed uninvestigated'. The pathogenesis of funct...