2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Stem) Project-Based Learning (Pbl) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: The Impact of Student Factors on Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
233
2
33

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 365 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
15
233
2
33
Order By: Relevance
“…At that point, project-based learning (PBL), so called as STEM PBL, has been offered as an effective instructional strategy for developing students' engineering competencies in addition to the necessary skills of other STEM disciplines (Capraro & Slough, 2008). Various properties are attributed to STEM PBL contexts such as having interdisciplinary learning objectives, ill-defined tasks, student-centered interactive group work and collaboration, involving hands on activities, and producing or designing an artifact (Han, Capraro & Capraro, 2015). According to Capraro and Slough (2008), STEM PBL contexts in which students work on multifaceted, information rich, authentic, and ill-defined tasks with well-defined learning outcomes can be used for STEM integration.…”
Section: Stem Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At that point, project-based learning (PBL), so called as STEM PBL, has been offered as an effective instructional strategy for developing students' engineering competencies in addition to the necessary skills of other STEM disciplines (Capraro & Slough, 2008). Various properties are attributed to STEM PBL contexts such as having interdisciplinary learning objectives, ill-defined tasks, student-centered interactive group work and collaboration, involving hands on activities, and producing or designing an artifact (Han, Capraro & Capraro, 2015). According to Capraro and Slough (2008), STEM PBL contexts in which students work on multifaceted, information rich, authentic, and ill-defined tasks with well-defined learning outcomes can be used for STEM integration.…”
Section: Stem Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Capraro and Slough (2008), STEM PBL contexts in which students work on multifaceted, information rich, authentic, and ill-defined tasks with well-defined learning outcomes can be used for STEM integration. The study by Han et al (2015) showed that STEM PBL contexts contributed to the academic achievement of low performing high school students. Roehrig (2012)'s categorization is useful in interpreting these different models through (i) content integration or (ii) context integration.…”
Section: Stem Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest test score could be obtained in the following cycle in applying learning strategy.The significant increase in the result becomes an excellent opportunity for sustainable learning improvement efforts. Many researchers have taken this benefit of this learning strategy (Han et al, 2015;Halili et al, 2015;Krajcso, 2016). The optimistic side of this research was that high ICT literacy of young Indonesian generation including in the rural area could be an opportunity for the improvement of learning quality especially related to critical thinking skills.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Following the guidelines of constructivism and exploratory learning, researchers have developed integrated cross-curricular projects for students with learning and other difficulties, such as Design Based Learning (Doppelt et al, 2008) and Project Based Learning (Han et al, 2015). Design Based Learning, which relates to scientific inquiry process, motivates students to solve real problems.…”
Section: Constructivism Exploratory Learning Hands-on Activities Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Project Based Learning improved students' scores in mathematics and science but not to the extent it was previously expected. Moreover, "students in the low economic status group ultimately received negative impacts from their engagement" in the Project and therefore it needs to be considered whether any particular aspect of Project "was a barrier for economically disadvantaged student's learning processes" (Han et al, 2015(Han et al, , p. 1108(Han et al, -1109.…”
Section: Constructivism Exploratory Learning Hands-on Activities Cmentioning
confidence: 99%