1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02552305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How safe is the coronary angiogram?

Abstract: The pertinent literature on complications of selective coronary angiography has been reviewed. Three reports that describe the incidence of major complications in large patient groups are presented for comparative analysis of their results and used as a baseline for consideration of factors that may affect variations between the actual and reported rate of complications. It is recommended that agreement be reached on formulating national standards for the performance of the examination, taking into account the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During coronary arteriography a number of haemodynamic and electrophysiological changes can be observed which are often thought to be due to the contrast media used. After the introduction of low osmolality contrast media, radiographic examinations of the heart have become safer (Adams 1982). These new agents include both ionic and non-ionic compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During coronary arteriography a number of haemodynamic and electrophysiological changes can be observed which are often thought to be due to the contrast media used. After the introduction of low osmolality contrast media, radiographic examinations of the heart have become safer (Adams 1982). These new agents include both ionic and non-ionic compounds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we consider the morbidity of angiography in addition to its mortality, there is little effect on the conclusions. Major complications (myocardial infarction and cerebral embolism) occur at a rate of approximately 0.2 percent (0.14%-0.27%) [24]. If QALE is halved following these major complications, there is very little effect on the choice of strategies in Table 5 (e.g., the strategies change in only four cases when the dollar-year trade-off is above $15,000) and only a minor effect on the two general conclusions.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter arrangement denies the existence of interventional radiology as a discipline and, more importantly, diminishes standards of practice. It has been shown repeatedly in a variety of specialties that there is a relation between the volume of procedures carried out and the standards achieved [2][3][4][5]. A radiologist who spends most of his time practising intervention is more likely to attract a sufficient volume of procedures for the maintenance of high standards.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%