2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-015-1384-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How safe is internal iliac artery embolisation prior to EVAR? A 10-year retrospective review

Abstract: We conclude that IIA embolisation remains a beneficial procedure, however, to minimise the risk of buttock claudication we advise against both bilateral IIA embolisation and short time intervals between embolisation and subsequent EVAR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Persistent buttock claudication was seen in only 16 % of patients with single internal iliac artery embolization. A shorter time from embolization to EVAR procedure was noted to be a risk factor for developing pelvic ischemia [44]. Surgeon-modified or dedicated iliac artery bifurcation stent grafts can be considered to avoid these complications.…”
Section: N/a Secondary Endograft or Explantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Persistent buttock claudication was seen in only 16 % of patients with single internal iliac artery embolization. A shorter time from embolization to EVAR procedure was noted to be a risk factor for developing pelvic ischemia [44]. Surgeon-modified or dedicated iliac artery bifurcation stent grafts can be considered to avoid these complications.…”
Section: N/a Secondary Endograft or Explantmentioning
confidence: 99%