2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How runaway stars boost galactic outflows

Abstract: Roughly ten per cent of OB stars are kicked out of their natal clusters before ending their life as supernovae. These so called runaway stars can travel hundreds of parsecs into the low-density interstellar medium, where momentum and energy from stellar feedback is efficiently deposited. In this work we explore how this mechanism affects large scale properties of the galaxy, such as outflows. To do so we use a new model which treats OB stars and their associated feedback processes on a star-by-star basis. With… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
1
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, runaway particles that have moved far from their birth places may be in lower-density environments, with higher mass refinement, at the time of SN explosions. To some extent, the inclusion of runaways is a partial solution to numerical difficulties in resolving SNe and driving hot superbubble breakout in moderate resolution simulations like Andersson et al (2020). In our simulations, however, resolution is much higher and the majority of SNe in clusters (> 90%) resolve the Sedov-Taylor stage of evolution, so that inclusion of runaways has insignificant impact on outflows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, runaway particles that have moved far from their birth places may be in lower-density environments, with higher mass refinement, at the time of SN explosions. To some extent, the inclusion of runaways is a partial solution to numerical difficulties in resolving SNe and driving hot superbubble breakout in moderate resolution simulations like Andersson et al (2020). In our simulations, however, resolution is much higher and the majority of SNe in clusters (> 90%) resolve the Sedov-Taylor stage of evolution, so that inclusion of runaways has insignificant impact on outflows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, various sources of stellar feedback that would contribute to the overall formation of large-scale outflows including type Ia SNe, stellar winds, shock-accelerated cosmic rays (e.g., Uhlig et al 2012;Salem & Bryan 2014;Dashyan & Dubois 2020), multi-scattering of infrared photons with dust (e.g., Hopkins et al 2011;Roškar et al 2014;Rosdahl & Teyssier 2015), or Lyman-α resonant line scattering (Kimm et al 2018;Smith et al 2017) are neglected. In addition runaway OB stars (Ceverino & Klypin 2009;Kimm & Cen 2014;Andersson et al 2020) or the unresolved porosity of the medium (Iffrig & Hennebelle 2015) are also ignored. In this regard, the NewHorizon simulation is unlikely to overestimate the effects of stellar feedback, as described in Sect.…”
Section: Feedback From Massive Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hopkins et al 2011;Roškar et al 2014;Rosdahl & Teyssier 2015) or Lyman-α resonant line scattering (Kimm et al 2018;Smith et al 2017) are neglected. In addition runaway OB stars (Ceverino & Klypin 2009;Kimm & Cen 2014;Andersson et al 2020) or the unresolved porosity of the medium (Iffrig & Hennebelle 2015) are also ignored. In this regard, the NewHorizon simulation is unlikely to over-estimate the effects of stellar feedback, as we discuss in more detail in Section 3.…”
Section: Feedback From Massive Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%