2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How rock samples can be representative of in situ condition: A case study of Callovo-Oxfordian claystones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 (triangles), together with data collected from other studies (dots) available in the literature on the same material. Combining these data with those presented by Conil et al (2018), it appears that the in-situ water content of COx ranges between 2 and 9 % and the void ratio between 0.15 to 0.25 and the material is considered saturated (Gs=2.7).…”
Section: Tested Materialssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 (triangles), together with data collected from other studies (dots) available in the literature on the same material. Combining these data with those presented by Conil et al (2018), it appears that the in-situ water content of COx ranges between 2 and 9 % and the void ratio between 0.15 to 0.25 and the material is considered saturated (Gs=2.7).…”
Section: Tested Materialssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…being richer in carbonates and the U.T. being a transition between the two others (Conil et al, 2018). In this study, samples coming from the U.A.…”
Section: Tested Materialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…220 km ESE of Paris), the French National Radioactive Waste Management Agency (ANDRA) operates a URF to explore the feasibility of Callovo-Oxfordian Clay to host radioactive waste (Armand et al, 2013). There, the roughly 160 Ma old claystone is encountered in a depth between ~ 417 -547 m (Gaucher et al, 2004): Its mineralogical composition (26 -42 % phyllosilicates; 27 -42 % carbonates; 24 -30 % tectosilicates -mostly quartz) is comparable to the one of Boom Clay (see Table 1; Gaucher et al, 2004;Conil et al, 2018). Opposed to Boom Clay, Callovo-Oxfordian Clay is heavily cemented by secondary (i.e.…”
Section: Boom Clay and Callovo-oxfordian Clay: Two Endmembers For Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sample preparation, a fresh claystone core was used (EST57917, h = 300 mm, d = 120 mm) extracted from a depth of 490 m. The samples have been cut to a cylindrical shape (h = d = 20 mm) using a wire saw in neighbouring locations within the core. The average water content ( m water m dry ) has been measured after drying at 105 • C for at least 24 h equal to 6.54 %, a value a bit lower than what has been reported by Conil et al (2018). This paper presents the analysis of the first sample of a series, the vertical axis of which is parallel to the bedding plane of the claystone.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This additional term allows the exploration of the influence of the change of degree of saturation during swelling. Taking φ 0 as 17.5 % from Conil et al (2018), S can be evaluated, and lines for ±3 % are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Measurement Of Local Greyscale Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%