2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10182-016-0270-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How risky is the optimal portfolio which maximizes the Sharpe ratio?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Alexander and Baptista [3,4] suggested the application of the VaR and the CVaR as measures of the risk in Markowitz's optimization problem instead of the variance and examined the economic implications of a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection. A brief connection between the TP and the minimum VaR portfolio has been drawn by Bodnar and Zabolotskyy [19] while focusing mainly on the riskiness of an optimal portfolio which maximizes the Sharpe ratio. Following the lines of Bodnar et al [18], we obtain explicit relations of minimum VaR and minimum CVaR portfolio weights in terms of estimated tangency portfolio weights, where these higher moments come into play their role.…”
Section: Application Implications Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Alexander and Baptista [3,4] suggested the application of the VaR and the CVaR as measures of the risk in Markowitz's optimization problem instead of the variance and examined the economic implications of a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection. A brief connection between the TP and the minimum VaR portfolio has been drawn by Bodnar and Zabolotskyy [19] while focusing mainly on the riskiness of an optimal portfolio which maximizes the Sharpe ratio. Following the lines of Bodnar et al [18], we obtain explicit relations of minimum VaR and minimum CVaR portfolio weights in terms of estimated tangency portfolio weights, where these higher moments come into play their role.…”
Section: Application Implications Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution ofŵ I when sampling from a Gaussian distribution is well established (Okhrin and Schmid 2006;Bodnar and Zabolotskyy 2017). In particular, the estimator S −1 is, by the law of large numbers, a consistent estimator of −1 and the consistency of (3) follows directly.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model gives the opportunities, especially for individual investors to monitor their portfolio by getting higher returns instead of lower risk (Ivanova & Dospatliev, 2017;Vo et al, 2019). Moreover, the SRM model contributed to the efficient frontier in the Markowitz optimisation problem and also gave a strong opinion to minimise the risk of the portfolio (Bodnar & Zabolotskyy, 2017). Although constructed portfolio was less diversified compared to Naïve (1/N) allocation, the composition of portfolio weights of the constructed portfolio was able to achieve high annual returns per unit of risk that was suitable for individual investors (Hoe & Siew, 2016).…”
Section: Portfolio Optimisationmentioning
confidence: 99%