2012
DOI: 10.5089/9781463933791.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Risky Are Banks' Risk Weighted Assets? Evidence From the Financial Crisis

Abstract: We study how investors account for the riskiness of banks' risk-weighted assets (RWA) by examining the determinants of stock returns and market measures of risk. We find that banks with lower RWA performed better during the US and European crises. This relationship is weaker in Europe where banks can use Basel II internal risk models. For large banks, investors paid less attention to RWA and rewarded instead lower wholesale funding and better asset quality. RWA do not, in general, predict market measures of ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Das and Sy (2012) Our paper differs from this literature. First, we do not simply describe differences across banks but use economic theory to formulate hypotheses that are tested on the basis of econometric models.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Das and Sy (2012) Our paper differs from this literature. First, we do not simply describe differences across banks but use economic theory to formulate hypotheses that are tested on the basis of econometric models.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…whether the concept of Basel's RWA really has the ability to represent a bank's true contribution to risk in the financial sector. See Das and Sy (2012) on that issue. Our analysis just follows the theoretical argument of Lautenschläger (2013) …”
Section: Limited Bank Leverage (Lr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 See also Das and Sy (2012), Hagendorff and Vallascas (2013), and Mariathasan and Merrouche (2014). 11 See, e.g., Glaeser and Shleifer (2001), Hellwig (2010), Hoenig (2010), Haldane (2011), Haldane (2012, Admati and The rest of the paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%