2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00707.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How reproducible is cutaneous electrogastrography? An in‐depth evidence‐based study1

Abstract: The feasibility of some electrogastrographic parameters to convey clinically useful information may be hampered by their fair reproducibility. Recoding of parameters of the cutaneous electrogastrogram from primary continuous to secondary categorical may help achieve a better agreement between repeat examinations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature is awash with examples of techniques that have failed to become established outside of the environments of tertiary care and research centres. 1,2 These failures have been largely as a consequence of not fulfilling these aforementioned principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature is awash with examples of techniques that have failed to become established outside of the environments of tertiary care and research centres. 1,2 These failures have been largely as a consequence of not fulfilling these aforementioned principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without any doubt provision of reproducible measurement results is a feature of paramount importance, expected to be assured by methods designed for research and/or clinical applications in medicine [28,[31][32][33] . Breath tests performed with the use of stable isotopes, such as 13 C, cannot be considered an exception in this respect, especially because during the past decade their clinical use has been constantly growing [24,34,35] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four methods applied-electrogastrography for the assessment of the gastric myoelectrical activity, the 13 C-acetate breath test for the gastric evacuation of a liquid meal, 13 C-octanoic breath test for the gastric emptying of solids, and the lactulose hydrogen breath test for the orocecal transit time-are all well established and widely used methodological approaches. In our laboratory we provided proof of reproducibility of every of the methods used in the current study (Jonderko et al, 2003;Jonderko et al, 2005b;Kasicka-Jonderko et al, 2005;KasickaJonderko et al, 2006b). Based on a repeat examinations model, it was shown that the 13 Cacetate breath test is capable of detecting a 6 min difference in T½ of an acaloric load, whereas the 13 C-octanoic acid breath test offered detectability of a 10 min difference in T½ of a solid caloric test meal with twelve paired studies at P=0.05 level, two-tailed (Kasicka- Jonderko et al, 2005;Kasicka-Jonderko et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrogastrograms were analyzed according to a previously described routine (Jonderko et al, 2005b). Briefly: a fast Fourier transform (FFT) was run on consecutive 256-sec data sets with a 196-sec overlap.…”
Section: Measurement and Analytical Techniques Gastric Myoelectrical mentioning
confidence: 99%