2013
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-s4-s5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How reliable is the linear noise approximation of gene regulatory networks?

Abstract: BackgroundThe linear noise approximation (LNA) is commonly used to predict how noise is regulated and exploited at the cellular level. These predictions are exact for reaction networks composed exclusively of first order reactions or for networks involving bimolecular reactions and large numbers of molecules. It is however well known that gene regulation involves bimolecular interactions with molecule numbers as small as a single copy of a particular gene. It is therefore questionable how reliable are the LNA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the system description with uncorrelated white noise in the Ito interpretation does not predict correctly the system behavior. This is not surprising because it has been known that for second-order reactions, the FPE with independent white noise is not accurate (Grima et al, 2011;Thomas et al, 2013). Different approaches have been introduced to resolve the discrepancy, exemplified by the colored noise approximations (Shahrezaei et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the system description with uncorrelated white noise in the Ito interpretation does not predict correctly the system behavior. This is not surprising because it has been known that for second-order reactions, the FPE with independent white noise is not accurate (Grima et al, 2011;Thomas et al, 2013). Different approaches have been introduced to resolve the discrepancy, exemplified by the colored noise approximations (Shahrezaei et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the a priori estimated upper bound for truncation error, we follow Eqn. (22) and (23) to assign values of α i = k s and β i+1 = k d (i + 1) for this network. We compute the a priori upper error bound for different truncations using Eqn.…”
Section: Birth-death Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine a priori estimated upper bounds for the truncation errors in MEG 1 and MEG 2 , we follow Eqn. (22) and (23) to assign values of α i = k e and β (i+1) = k m (i + 1) for the M EG 1 . Because of the dependency of protein synthesis on the mRNA copy numbers, we set α i = 64 · k t and β i+1 = k d (i + 1) following Eqn.…”
Section: Single Gene Expression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fluctuations associated with at least one of the species participating in each of the second-order reaction are Poissonian and uncorrelated with the fluctuations of other species. Also, LNA remains valid for faster activation and deactivation (or synthesis and degradation) rates of the corresponding components compared to the coarse-grained (steady state) time scale [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%