All Days 2006
DOI: 10.2118/99386-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Reliable Is Fluid Gradient in Gas/Condensate Reservoirs?

Abstract: TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractCollection and analysis of gas/condensate fluid samples present considerable challenges. That is because downhole sampling of a gas/condensate fluid, unlike its oil counterpart, does not guarantee retrieval of single-phase fluid. The same is true for surface sampling because of incomplete surface and/or downhole separation. Given this reality, the PVT analysis of any fluid sample with an equation-of-state (EOS) model demands that the results are verified with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For formation fluids of low densities, like gases and gas condensates, the limitations of the sensor technology may become an issue. Kabir and Pop (2007) discuss this subject and present case studies and outline methods to quantify the accuracy of the pressure survey. Hashem et al (2004) present further techniques to improve the data quality of formation testing.…”
Section: Static Formation Pressure Surveys and Downhole Fluid Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For formation fluids of low densities, like gases and gas condensates, the limitations of the sensor technology may become an issue. Kabir and Pop (2007) discuss this subject and present case studies and outline methods to quantify the accuracy of the pressure survey. Hashem et al (2004) present further techniques to improve the data quality of formation testing.…”
Section: Static Formation Pressure Surveys and Downhole Fluid Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is the evaluation of compositional changes into the reservoir due to gravitational and temperature gradients (effects analyzed in several studies: Zuo et al (2009);Kabir et al (2007); Hoier and Curtis (2000); Fujisawa et al (2008); and it is possible to simulate with commercial software) which will be able to compared with reservoir fluid analysis done in the same field or fields with similar characteristics. The first one is the interval selection far away from gas-water contact to assure a clean reservoir fluid sampl and to avoid rock-fluid properties changes because of water breakthrough.…”
Section: Interval Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separately, as detailed in reference [6], it is possible to compute and compare theoretical and statistical gradient errors. The theoretical error is computed on the basis of user specified depth and pressure repeatability errors (frequently taken respectively as 1 ft and 0.3 psi, as observed from numerous existing datasets).…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical error is computed on the basis of user specified depth and pressure repeatability errors (frequently taken respectively as 1 ft and 0.3 psi, as observed from numerous existing datasets). In reference [6] the standard error in the gradients is derived under the assumption that the data is uniformly distributed over a tested interval h, and that on this interval no fluid compositional variation exists. It is function of the number of data points K and can be calculated by (4) σp and σz being respectively the pressure and depth repeatability.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation