2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.112877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How reliable is dietary supplement labelling?—Experiences from the analysis of ecdysterone supplements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The recently reported study of Ambrosio et al 14 showed variability of the 20‐OHE concentration in 12 supplements tested and also mentioned the fact that the concentration of 20‐OHE was often significantly lower than claimed on the label. The current study confirmed that finding, albeit in different supplements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The recently reported study of Ambrosio et al 14 showed variability of the 20‐OHE concentration in 12 supplements tested and also mentioned the fact that the concentration of 20‐OHE was often significantly lower than claimed on the label. The current study confirmed that finding, albeit in different supplements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The detection of 20‐OHE and its metabolites after administration of high doses in human volunteers (20 and 50 mg) has been reported by Tsitsimpikou et al 10 and Parr et al, 11 respectively. However, the doses present in the supplements vary considerably and often do not accurately reflect those on the label 14 . Therefore, there is a need to quantitate the 20‐OHE levels in the supplements themselves, as well as, detect the fate, both parent and metabolite, after in vivo ingestion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early experimental studies and clinical trials on humans have indicated that 20E or plant extracts containing significant amounts of ecdysteroids [104]: A major aim of early human studies was to improve physical performances of healthy young people, and they showed a significant improvement in muscle mass and/or endurance after a few days/weeks. Such experiments paved the way, directly or indirectly, for use as a "doping substance" by sportsmen or bodybuilders based on the consumption of uncontrolled dietary supplements [162]. The recent confirmation of these anabolic results [163] led the authors to propose the inscription of 20E on the list of doping prohibited substances [164].…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uno de los estudios seleccionados mostró que 6 de los 15 SN analizados incluían detalles sobre el contenido de cafeína en el etiquetado, y el porcentaje hallado tenía una variación de entre el 59 % y el 176 % con respecto al declarado en el panel nutricional (24). Este tipo de negligencia no es exclusiva de los SN, ya que se ha evidenciado también en otros tipos de productos como son los complementos dietéticos, los alimentos y los productos alimentarios (11,17,32). Además, en los estudios revisados, la diferencia entre el contenido real y el declarado existía tanto por exceso como por defecto (18,20,21).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified