2015
DOI: 10.1363/4121015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Reliable Are Reports of Early Adolescent Reproductive and Sexual Health Events in Demographic and Health Surveys?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our analysis, we selected only students who participated at both T1 and T2 (n = 3,184). In addition, to be able to predict the initiation of early sexual intercourse, i.e., intercourse experience before the age of 15 years [ 1 – 3 , 43 ], we selected only participants who were younger than 15 years old at both T1 and T2 (n = 1,001 excluded) and who at T1 had never had sexual intercourse (n = 26 excluded). Furthermore, we excluded participants with missing information on sexual intercourse at T1 (n = 7) and/or T2 (n = 9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our analysis, we selected only students who participated at both T1 and T2 (n = 3,184). In addition, to be able to predict the initiation of early sexual intercourse, i.e., intercourse experience before the age of 15 years [ 1 – 3 , 43 ], we selected only participants who were younger than 15 years old at both T1 and T2 (n = 1,001 excluded) and who at T1 had never had sexual intercourse (n = 26 excluded). Furthermore, we excluded participants with missing information on sexual intercourse at T1 (n = 7) and/or T2 (n = 9).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the data relies on respondents’ recall for age at first birth. There is evidence that social-desirability bias and concern around potential censure may deter women from reporting very early ages at birth, but this appears to be mostly when respondents are under 20 years old, rather than in the 20–29 year age group used in this study 47. Finally, the data are now somewhat dated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Respondents aged 15–49 years were included in the analysis; in 16 of the 90 surveys, only ever-married women were sampled (online supplementary material 1). We calculated the numbers of live births for the numerators and denominators for the 10-year period before each survey, because of likely under-reporting of early adolescent births by girls and young women who were in the 15–19 years age group at the time of the survey 34…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%