2017
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How real-life health messages engage our brains: Shared processing of effective anti-alcohol videos

Abstract: Health communication via mass media is an important strategy when targeting risky drinking, but many questions remain about how health messages are processed and how they unfold their effects within receivers. Here we examine how the brains of young adults—a key target group for alcohol prevention—‘tune in’ to real-life health prevention messages about risky alcohol use. In a first study, a large sample of authentic public service announcements (PSAs) targeting the risks of alcohol was characterized using esta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also know that the MFG is implicated in processing audiovisual narratives ( Wilson et al , 2008 ) like the PSAs used in this study. However, a recent study investigating intersubject correlations (ISC) among both high- and low-risk subjects viewing health-message PSAs, did not observe ISCs in this region ( Imhof et al , 2017 ). To be clear, we are not arguing that the absence of a statistically significant result implies no effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also know that the MFG is implicated in processing audiovisual narratives ( Wilson et al , 2008 ) like the PSAs used in this study. However, a recent study investigating intersubject correlations (ISC) among both high- and low-risk subjects viewing health-message PSAs, did not observe ISCs in this region ( Imhof et al , 2017 ). To be clear, we are not arguing that the absence of a statistically significant result implies no effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…counterarguing, message disengagement) or not. With two exceptions ( Weber et al , 2014 ; Imhof et al , 2017 ), tests using an ELM framework are largely absent from the persuasion neuroscience literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, population-level effects on click-through rates can only emerge if the relevant message—in this case, the banner—can collectively influence a large number of individuals (Imhof et al, 2017 , 2020 ; Grall and Schmälzle, 2020 ). Our strategy to capture brain activity within a smaller sample of current smokers exposed to the same messages probes this collective-level response to messaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that attentional account could explain why the latter option is more preferred, while the first appear as less attractive. For instance, the attentional processing is strongly related to different contents of the health benefit [55] as well as the specific topic and audience that the message is addressed to. However, the most common features that may influence persuasion is the perceived argument strength, which refers to individual perceptions of the quality and persuasiveness of the message [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%